| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 5.72% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
| Boot Drive | 69.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
| System | Samsung 270B4E/270B5E/271B4E/271B5E (all builds) |
| Motherboard | SAMSUNG NT271B5E-X03/C |
| Memory | 3.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20140424 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | Apr 07 '21 at 14:47 |
| Run Duration | 121 Seconds |
| Run User | PHL-User |
| Background CPU | 47% |
| CPU Throttled | 99% |
PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-3340M
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
|
48%
Average
|
43% 63.5 Pts
|
16% 125 Pts
|
8% 125 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD Radeon HD 8600/8700M
Sanyo(144D C719) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 27.20.14535.1000
|
5.72%
Terrible
|
6% 8.93 fps
|
6% 7.5 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
44GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 240 219 215 220 208 209 MB/s
|
69.2%
Good
|
73% 324 MB/s
|
102% 32.5 MB/s
|
119% 171 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Hynix HMT41GS6AFR8A-PB 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
|
16.7%
Very poor
|
14% 4.87 GB/s
|
14% 5.03 GB/s
|
45% 89.5 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical 270B4E/270B5E/271B4E/271B5E Builds (Compare 1 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Samsung 270B4E/270B5E/271B4E/271B5E
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 65% - Good | Total price: $100 |