Asus MAXIMUS VIII RANGER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 63%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics99.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (56%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS VIII RANGER  (all builds)
Memory7.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171227
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateApr 07 '21 at 13:55
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 56%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6600K-$81
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
62% Good
Memory 71.9
1-Core 91.4
2-Core 162
63% 109 Pts
4-Core 292
8-Core 351
42% 322 Pts
64-Core 366
23% 366 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 62%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
Asus(1043 8681) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2265 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 460.79
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
99.6% Outstanding
Lighting 121
Reflection 114
Parallax 136
98% 124 fps
MRender 142
Gravity 131
Splatting 108
102% 127 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 99.6%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$158
1GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,946
Write 847
Mixed 1,212
294% 1,335 MB/s
4K Read 40.3
4K Write 77.1
4K Mixed 50.9
167% 56.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,077
DQ Write 800
DQ Mixed 1,033
747% 970 MB/s
Poor: 214% Great: 372%
Crucial M4 256GB-$218
133GB free
Firmware: 040H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 198 205 199 213 207 217 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
56.2% Above average
Read 412
Write 199
Mixed 231
SusWrite 206
58% 262 MB/s
4K Read 16.7
4K Write 60.2
4K Mixed 13.3
74% 30.1 MB/s
DQ Read 125
DQ Write 116
DQ Mixed 23.7
44% 88 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 74%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 32GB-$8
29GB free, PID 5581
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 20 17 4.7 3.5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
14% Very poor
Read 33.3
Write 12.2
Mixed 11
SusWrite 11.5
19% 17 MB/s
4K Read 4.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1.6
133% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14%
Great: 38%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-2400 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
50.5% Above average
MC Read 20
MC Write 18.5
MC Mixed 16.4
52% 18.3 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 13.7
37% 13 GB/s
Latency 97
41% 97 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS VIII RANGER Builds (Compare 3,302 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VIII RANGER - $286

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $750
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback