Gigabyte GA-H370 AORUS GAMING 3-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 168%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 158%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics191% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive104% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemGigabyte H370AORUSGAMING3
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H370 AORUS GAMING 3-CF  (all builds)
Memory13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200916
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 07 '21 at 13:17
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700-$200
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
90.6% Outstanding
Memory 88.8
1-Core 144
2-Core 268
93% 167 Pts
4-Core 496
8-Core 892
83% 694 Pts
64-Core 1,061
66% 1,061 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 90.6%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6900-XT-$1,000
PowerColor(148C 2408) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 21.3.2
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
191% Outstanding
Lighting 247
Reflection 251
Parallax 522
202% 340 fps
MRender 388
Gravity 197
Splatting 286
236% 290 fps
Poor: 177%
This bench: 191%
Great: 209%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
150GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 353 303 296 294 293 242 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 402
Write 362
Mixed 409
SusWrite 297
83% 367 MB/s
4K Read 38.5
4K Write 92.8
4K Mixed 50.7
172% 60.7 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 335
DQ Mixed 350
264% 355 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 104%
Great: 129%
WD WD2002FYPS-01U1B0 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 02.S0502
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 59 59 58 60 60 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
45.8% Average
Read 100
Write 98.1
Mixed 86
SusWrite 59
64% 85.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.8
183% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 45.8%
Great: 63%
TOSHIBA TransMemory-Mx 64GB
32GB free, PID 6545
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 11 15 14 14 14 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
10.2% Very poor
Read 38.6
Write 33.3
Mixed 5.5
SusWrite 13.4
27% 22.7 MB/s
4K Read 7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
26% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 10.2%
Great: 29%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance RGB DDR4 3466 C16 2x8GB-$253
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
69.5% Good
MC Read 26.9
MC Write 26.1
MC Mixed 19.5
69% 24.2 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 28.7
SC Mixed 21.4
64% 22.4 GB/s
Latency 68.7
58% 68.7 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 69.5%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H370 AORUS GAMING 3-CF Builds (Compare 413 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H370 AORUS GAMING 3-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $345
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $274Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback