Gigabyte GA-H310M H 2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics3.29% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H310M H 2.0  (all builds)
Memory5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190308
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 07 '21 at 02:01
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU 30%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i3-9100F-$170
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
83.8% Excellent
Memory 87.3
1-Core 124
2-Core 243
87% 152 Pts
4-Core 464
8-Core 464
63% 464 Pts
64-Core 465
31% 465 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 83.8%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
MSI(1462 8C93) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 461.92
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
3.29% Terrible
Lighting 4.2
Reflection 4.2
Parallax 4.4
3% 4.27 fps
MRender 4
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 5
3% 4.3 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.29%
Great: 4%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Toshiba P300 1TB-$53
586GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS2OA8R0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 136 99 147 147 150 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
55.5% Above average
Read 56.5
Write 127
Mixed 57.8
SusWrite 137
69% 94.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.4
111% 1 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 107%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2010)-$30
149GB free
Firmware: 4101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 40 35 39 41 41 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
21.6% Poor
Read 36
Write 39
Mixed 19.5
SusWrite 39.1
24% 33.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.3
57% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 21.6%
Great: 50%
SanDisk Ultra 64GB
6GB free, PID 558a
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7 7 7 7.1 5.3 5.8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
10.3% Very poor
Read 39
Write 7
Mixed 12
SusWrite 6.5
17% 16.1 MB/s
4K Read 5.7
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 1
76% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 10.3%
Great: 32%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Kingston HyperX 2400 C15 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
44.3% Average
MC Read 16.5
MC Write 16
MC Mixed 11.9
42% 14.8 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 15.2
SC Mixed 13
40% 13.9 GB/s
Latency 70.2
57% 70.2 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 44.3%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical GA-H310M H 2.0 Builds (Compare 4,982 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H310M H 2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $360
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11400F $196Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $50
Intel Core i5-11600K $255Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-10600K $217Nvidia RTX 3080 $700Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $40
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $102SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback