Asus PRIME Z370-P

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 84%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 78%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics91.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME Z370-P  (all builds)
Memory18.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210113
Uptime1 Days
Run DateApr 06 '21 at 21:13
Run Duration171 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 11%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$186
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
89.2% Excellent
Memory 88.9
1-Core 134
2-Core 250
88% 158 Pts
4-Core 481
8-Core 794
78% 638 Pts
64-Core 1,020
63% 1,020 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 89.2%
Great: 100%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400
Nvidia(10DE 1B80) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2075 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 461.92
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
91.5% Outstanding
Lighting 109
Reflection 128
Parallax 109
89% 115 fps
MRender 111
Gravity 131
Splatting 114
97% 119 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 91.5%
Great: 110%
Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7)
Asus(1043 8694) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
7.12% Terrible
Lighting 7.7
Reflection 10.5
Parallax 9.1
6% 9.1 fps
MRender 11.4
Gravity 7.8
Splatting 12.3
9% 10.5 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 7.12%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$92
26GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,344
Write 1,470
Mixed 1,260
373% 1,692 MB/s
4K Read 59.4
4K Write 150
4K Mixed 79.4
271% 96.2 MB/s
DQ Read 983
DQ Write 836
DQ Mixed 957
704% 925 MB/s
Poor: 160% Great: 280%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
207GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 473 478 477 459 429 429 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
129% Outstanding
Read 498
Write 483
Mixed 417
SusWrite 458
105% 464 MB/s
4K Read 45.3
4K Write 115
4K Mixed 62.8
210% 74.2 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 343
DQ Mixed 357
269% 360 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 129%
Great: 134%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39
365GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 107 108 108 108 108 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
75.6% Very good
Read 156
Write 159
Mixed 80.4
SusWrite 107
92% 126 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
139% 1 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 75.6%
Great: 113%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64
197GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 113 116 116 116 116 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
71.8% Very good
Read 135
Write 135
Mixed 91.2
SusWrite 115
88% 119 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
193% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 71.8%
Great: 85%
Intenso USB 3.0 Device 1TB
653GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 68 65 58 57 53 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
31.6% Below average
Read 92
Write 74.4
Mixed 39.3
SusWrite 62.2
86% 67 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
76% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 31.6%
Great: 49%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMK16GX4M2A2666C16 CMK16GX4M2A2666C16 CM4X8GF2666C16K4 CM4X8GF2666C16K4 32GB
2667, 2667, 2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
81.1% Excellent
MC Read 30.7
MC Write 30.6
MC Mixed 24.6
82% 28.6 GB/s
SC Read 16.3
SC Write 35.9
SC Mixed 24.4
73% 25.5 GB/s
Latency 68.6
58% 68.6 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 81.1%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME Z370-P Builds (Compare 10,300 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus PRIME Z370-P - $94

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $520
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback