PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 41.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-H310M M.2 2.0 (all builds) |
Memory | 2.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
Display | 2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20190529 |
Uptime | 2.8 Days |
Run Date | Apr 06 '21 at 20:00 |
Run Duration | 116 Seconds |
Run User | BRA-User |
Background CPU | 17% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
65.6%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (48th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
41.7%
Average
|
|||
Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39
297GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 42 38 65 89 64 MB/s
|
20.4%
Poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-2666 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
|
30.8%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples | 389x |
Core i3-9100FIntel $88Bench 80%, 34,310 samples | 342x |
Core i5-9400Intel $161Bench 86%, 22,187 samples | 146x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 116x |
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples | 84x |
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples | 74x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 97% - Outstanding | Total price: $263 |