Intel H55

Performance Results


Gaming 47% Yacht	Desktop 71% Battleship	Workstation 37% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	69.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	51.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Intel H55 (all builds)
Memory	13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191220
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 05 '21 at 19:55
Run Duration	143 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	39%

Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 860-$339 51,451 User benchmarks, average bench 64% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	66.5% Good	Memory 88.1 1-Core 68.4 2-Core 141 61% 99.2 Pts	4-Core 244 8-Core 353 37% 299 Pts	64-Core 352 22% 352 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 66.5% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$143 230,793 User benchmarks, average bench 68% Gigabyte(1458 3FC8) CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 465.89 Performing below potential (63^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	69.4% Good	Lighting 92 Reflection 88.2 Parallax 76.3 75% 85.5 fps	MRender 65.2 Gravity 78.6 Splatting 70.8 59% 71.5 fps
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 69.4% Great: 73%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SA400S37 480GB 155 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 393GB free (System drive) Firmware: S1128B0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 190 230 225 226 227 MB/s Performing below potential (46^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	51.3% Above average	Read 253 Write 206 Mixed 211 SusWrite 204 49% 218 MB/s	4K Read 21.1 4K Write 37.7 4K Mixed 16.4 73% 25.1 MB/s	DQ Read 120 DQ Write 188 DQ Mixed 0.4 43% 103 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 51.3% Great: 90%
WD WD20EZAZ-00WGYX0 2TB 9,544 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 280GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 93 95 96 97 95 MB/s Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	55.9% Above average	Read 98.5 Write 78 Mixed 63.7 SusWrite 93.8 62% 83.5 MB/s	4K Read 2.1 4K Write 7.2 4K Mixed 0.7 299% 3.33 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 55.9% Great: 101%
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$24 89,637 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 56GB free Firmware: SC13 SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 69 70 71 71 71 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	38.5% Below average	Read 66.5 Write 60.3 Mixed 42.9 SusWrite 67.3 44% 59.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 141% 1 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 38.5% Great: 60%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 16GB 70,565 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 0, 0 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	41.1% Average	MC Read 16.5 MC Write 12.5 MC Mixed 13 40% 14 GB/s	SC Read 11 SC Write 10.2 SC Mixed 11.8 31% 11 GB/s	Latency 69.4 58% 69.4 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 41.1% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H55 Builds (Compare 2,087 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 46%

Yacht

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel H55

CPU
Core i5 650Intel $70Bench 46%, 42,063 samples	639x
Core i7 860Intel $339Bench 64%, 51,451 samples	241x
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples	219x

GPU
HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 20,588 samples	441x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	298x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	176x

SSD
256GB 256GBSSDBench 77%, 9,229 samples	97x
128GB 128GBSSDBench 65%, 7,332 samples	73x
RZX-19SSD6G/120GB 120GBBench 66%, 43 samples	52x

RAM
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	1,139x
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	306x
1x4GBUnknownBench 28%, 154,807 samples	259x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 68% - Good

Total price: $70

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16