Asus TUF GAMING FX504GM_FX80GM

Performance Results


Gaming 51% Yacht	Desktop 89% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 46% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	53.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	25.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Asus TUF GAMING FX504GM_FX80GM (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK FX504GM
Memory	11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190610
Uptime	1.2 Days
Run Date	Apr 05 '21 at 18:03
Run Duration	125 Seconds
Run User	BLR-User
Background CPU	0%
CPU Throttled	99%

PC Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8750H 442,631 User benchmarks, average bench 70% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	86.4% Excellent	Memory 93.7 1-Core 123 2-Core 234 86% 150 Pts	4-Core 439 8-Core 553 64% 496 Pts	64-Core 1,026 64% 1,026 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 86.4% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile) 177,775 User benchmarks, average bench 47% Asus(1043 1391) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.6140 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	53.3% Above average	Lighting 65.3 Reflection 67.6 Parallax 64.1 53% 65.7 fps	MRender 70.9 Gravity 65.5 Splatting 61.5 54% 66 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 53.3% Great: 52%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston RBUSNS8180DS3256GJ 256GB 2,813 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 32GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFK61E1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 61 21 34 17 35 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	25.8% Poor	Read 447 Write 348 Mixed 97.2 SusWrite 44 52% 234 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 16.1 4K Mixed 1.4 11% 6.07 MB/s	DQ Read 62.6 DQ Write 25.3 DQ Mixed 29.9 26% 39.3 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 25.8% Great: 79%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 750GB 4,800 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 53GB free Firmware: JB2OA3J0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 83 84 85 90 109 MB/s Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	64.8% Good	Read 137 Write 128 Mixed 28.1 SusWrite 88.8 69% 95.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.6 127% 1 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 64.8% Great: 74%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 0443 RMSA3260ME78HAF-2666 16GB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 2667, 2667 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	79% Very good	MC Read 31.3 MC Write 29.6 MC Mixed 22.3 79% 27.7 GB/s	SC Read 17.7 SC Write 29.8 SC Mixed 25.4 69% 24.3 GB/s	Latency 60.6 66% 60.6 ns
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 79% Great: 85%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING FX504GM_FX80GM Builds (Compare 1,213 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 35%

Sail boat

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 30%

Sail boat

System: Asus TUF GAMING FX504GM_FX80GM

CPU
Core i7-8750HIntelBench 70%, 442,631 samples	732x
Core i5-8300HIntelBench 65%, 167,898 samples	481x

GPU
GTX 1060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 47%, 177,775 samples	635x
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	577x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $233Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	1x

SSD
RBUSNS8154P3256GJ 256GBKingstonBench 96%, 18,615 samples	218x
Micron_1100_MTFDDAV256TBN 256GBBench 72%, 50,765 samples	199x
RBUSNS8154P3128GJ 128GBKingstonBench 81%, 18,233 samples	172x

RAM
HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 1x8GBHynixBench 40%, 73,050 samples	234x
HMA82GS6CJR8N-VK 1x16GBHynixBench 44%, 33,430 samples	175x
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 40%, 96,646 samples	86x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16