Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 53% Yacht	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	1.84% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	37.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2450M-$225 51,836 User benchmarks, average bench 49% CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	53.4% Above average	Memory 73.5 1-Core 80.5 2-Core 139 58% 97.5 Pts	4-Core 195 8-Core 195 26% 195 Pts	64-Core 196 12% 196 Pts
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 53.4% Great: 59%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz) 110,588 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Dell(1028 0564) 2GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459 Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	1.84% Terrible	Lighting 2.2 Reflection 2.5 Parallax 1.6 2% 2.1 fps	MRender 2.9 Gravity 1.3 Splatting 2.8 2% 2.33 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.84% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 240GB 86,316 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 146GB free (System drive) Firmware: UF2204RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 194 130 119 101 128 122 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	37.4% Below average	Read 399 Write 343 Mixed 280 SusWrite 132 64% 288 MB/s	4K Read 13.5 4K Write 23.1 4K Mixed 5.4 40% 14 MB/s	DQ Read 7.7 DQ Write 81.7 DQ Mixed 18.6 22% 36 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 37.4% Great: 56%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5773DH0-CH9 M471B5173DB0-YK0 6GB 72 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	46.5% Average	MC Read 17.3 MC Write 16.7 MC Mixed 14.5 46% 16.2 GB/s	SC Read 14.3 SC Write 14.9 SC Mixed 13.9 41% 14.4 GB/s	Latency 93.6 43% 93.6 ns
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 46.5% Great: 46%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	308x
GeForce GT 650MNvidiaBench 6%, 12,732 samples	177x
Ivy 4PhdgdBench 4%, 153 samples	1x

RAM
HMT351S6CFR8C-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 50%, 25,458 samples	79x
NT4GC64B8HG0NS-DI 2x4GBNanyaBench 51%, 5,366 samples	71x
M471B5273EB0-CK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 51%, 5,979 samples	29x

Value: 48% - Average

Total price: $529

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16