Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 78%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics90.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive97% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory8.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200805
Uptime5 Days
Run DateApr 05 '21 at 01:50
Run Duration173 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X-$320
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
86.6% Excellent
Memory 87.1
1-Core 138
2-Core 276
94% 167 Pts
4-Core 463
8-Core 813
80% 638 Pts
64-Core 1076
72% 1076 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 86.6%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$359
Zotac(19DA 2435) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 465.89
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
90.8% Outstanding
Lighting 111
Reflection 123
Parallax 127
90% 120 fps
MRender 91.3
Gravity 118
Splatting 107
92% 105 fps
Poor: 89%
This bench: 90.8%
Great: 105%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
245GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 417 361 351 345 349 345 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
97% Outstanding
Read 502
Write 375
Mixed 323
SusWrite 361
87% 390 MB/s
4K Read 31.2
4K Write 93.6
4K Mixed 40.4
149% 55.1 MB/s
DQ Read 222
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 168
136% 192 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 97%
Great: 129%
Seagate BarraCuda SSD ZA1000CM10002 1TB
31GB free
Firmware: STAS1024
SusWrite @10s intervals: 425 400 152 254 45 69 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
72.7% Very good
Read 480
Write 434
Mixed 389
SusWrite 224
86% 382 MB/s
4K Read 25.2
4K Write 44.5
4K Mixed 29
99% 32.9 MB/s
DQ Read 222
DQ Write 188
DQ Mixed 171
138% 194 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 113%
WD WD1002FBYS-02A6B0 1TB
538GB free
Firmware: 03.00C06
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 96 97 97 98 96 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
58.1% Above average
Read 105
Write 95.7
Mixed 64.7
SusWrite 96.6
67% 90.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1
196% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 58.1%
Great: 63%
WD easystore 264D 12TB
10TB free, PID 264d
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 192 190 193 194 195 196 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 180
Write 192
Mixed 166
SusWrite 193
252% 183 MB/s
4K Read 16.9
4K Write 10.1
4K Mixed 0.9
437% 9.3 MB/s
DQ Read 0.6
DQ Write 5.6
DQ Mixed 1.4
240% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 103%
Great: 105%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3600 C18 2x8GB-$80
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
90.4% Outstanding
MC Read 35.1
MC Write 26.2
MC Mixed 35.1
92% 32.1 GB/s
SC Read 26.3
SC Write 26
SC Mixed 34
82% 28.8 GB/s
Latency 70.4
57% 70.4 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 90.4%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 24,820 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 104%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 106%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $180

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $1,119
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
Intel Core i7-11700K $346Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $77SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback