MSI B450 TOMAHAWK MAX II (MS-7C02)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics37.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive112% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C02
MotherboardMSI B450 TOMAHAWK MAX II (MS-7C02)  (all builds)
Memory27.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200917
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 04 '21 at 18:48
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$205
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
89.1% Excellent
Memory 78.8
1-Core 154
2-Core 303
96% 179 Pts
4-Core 532
8-Core 996
91% 764 Pts
64-Core 1,462
90% 1,462 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 89.1%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
EVGA(3842 2968) 2GB
CLim: 1544 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 465.89
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
37.3% Below average
Lighting 48.1
Reflection 50.9
Parallax 44.7
39% 47.9 fps
MRender 37.7
Gravity 45.2
Splatting 39.9
34% 40.9 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 37.3%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GB
194GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 401020WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 390 429 337 310 432 424 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 503
Write 479
Mixed 378
SusWrite 387
98% 436 MB/s
4K Read 41.1
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 41.9
172% 63 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 326
DQ Mixed 238
209% 313 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 112%
Great: 111%
WDC WDS200T2B0B-00YS70 2TB
641GB free
Firmware: 415000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 454 436 426 422 411 421 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 501
Write 452
Mixed 398
SusWrite 428
100% 445 MB/s
4K Read 40.1
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 52
184% 66.1 MB/s
DQ Read 308
DQ Write 282
DQ Mixed 242
196% 278 MB/s
Poor: 76%
This bench: 116%
Great: 118%
WD WD2003FYPS-27W9B 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 04.05G09
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 111 112 113 112 112 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
64.1% Good
Read 112
Write 107
Mixed 102
SusWrite 112
80% 108 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
172% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 64.1%
Great: 61%
Seagate FreeAgent GoFlex 1TB
778GB free, PID 5021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 39 40 40 40 39 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
15.2% Very poor
Read 36.3
Write 39.5
Mixed 18
SusWrite 39.3
45% 33.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
29% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 15.2%
Great: 38%
WD My Book Essentials 2TB
807GB free, PID 1110
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 40 40 39 39 38 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
20.4% Poor
Read 37.2
Write 34.5
Mixed 29
SusWrite 38.7
47% 34.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
94% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 20.4%
Great: 22%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3600 C18 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
88.6% Excellent
MC Read 33.3
MC Write 26.4
MC Mixed 34.5
90% 31.4 GB/s
SC Read 27.2
SC Write 26.7
SC Mixed 35.6
85% 29.8 GB/s
Latency 82.9
48% 82.9 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 88.6%
Great: 122%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B450 TOMAHAWK MAX II (MS-7C02) Builds (Compare 5,936 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 87%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 82%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: MSI B450 TOMAHAWK MAX II (MS-7C02)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $501
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback