Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 96%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 97%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics99.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive378% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210201
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 04 '21 at 18:42
Run Duration382 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X-$314
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
92.7% Outstanding
Memory 84.3
1-Core 142
2-Core 281
94% 169 Pts
4-Core 542
8-Core 950
94% 746 Pts
64-Core 1,475
99% 1,475 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 92.7%
Great: 95%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$330
MSI(1462 3976) ≥ 4GB; msi geforce gaming x RTX 3060 12GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 461.72
Performing below potential (71st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
99.5% Outstanding
Lighting 133
Reflection 120
Parallax 127
107% 126 fps
MRender 146
Gravity 106
Splatting 89.8
90% 114 fps
Poor: 88%
This bench: 99.5%
Great: 106%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Sabrent Rocket 4 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$90
404GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RKT401.3 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1395 2331 2368 2382 2377 1982 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
378% Outstanding
Read 2,360
Write 2,374
Mixed 1970
SusWrite 2139
498% 2,211 MB/s
4K Read 57.1
4K Write 212
4K Mixed 85.3
308% 118 MB/s
DQ Read 1,457
DQ Write 1,155
DQ Mixed 1,321
985% 1,311 MB/s
Poor: 155%
This bench: 378%
Great: 385%
OCZ ARC 100 240GB-$120
188GB free
Firmware: 1.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 430 419 406 431 393 431 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
79% Very good
Read 383
Write 423
Mixed 309
SusWrite 418
87% 383 MB/s
4K Read 20.7
4K Write 46.7
4K Mixed 27.3
91% 31.6 MB/s
DQ Read 249
DQ Write 192
DQ Mixed 204
157% 215 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 79%
Great: 101%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$70
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 136 137 140 136 141 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
81.4% Excellent
Read 146
Write 147
Mixed 90.9
SusWrite 138
96% 130 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.9
186% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 81.4%
Great: 85%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$70
1TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 116 119 117 119 118 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
72% Very good
Read 134
Write 106
Mixed 79.8
SusWrite 117
80% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
178% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 72%
Great: 85%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2016)-$114
200GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 164 162 163 165 164 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
84.5% Excellent
Read 133
Write 106
Mixed 65.5
SusWrite 162
85% 117 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
164% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 84.5%
Great: 106%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$75
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC52
SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 157 158 161 160 159 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
89.2% Excellent
Read 152
Write 114
Mixed 68.7
SusWrite 159
90% 124 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
127% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 89.2%
Great: 98%
Seagate Barracuda 6TB (2017)-$124
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 79 81 84 88 85 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
38.5% Below average
Read 49.9
Write 71.2
Mixed 60.4
SusWrite 82.8
49% 66.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 0.4
189% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 38.5%
Great: 88%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$148
6TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 172 178 171 176 177 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
81.4% Excellent
Read 109
Write 116
Mixed 64.9
SusWrite 173
85% 116 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 0.7
239% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 81.4%
Great: 91%
SABRENT 1TB
640GB free
Firmware: RKT343.4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2560 2592 1526 1147 1146 1150 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 19% Great: 85%
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 32GB
29GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 25 25 25 25 25 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
34.7% Below average
Read 131
Write 24.7
Mixed 58.3
SusWrite 25.2
65% 59.9 MB/s
4K Read 5.4
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 3.6
241% 3.97 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 34.7%
Great: 39%
SanDisk Ultra Flair USB 3.0 16GB-$6
10GB free, PID 5591
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 14 14 14 13 14 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
32.1% Below average
Read 148
Write 37.4
Mixed 42.2
SusWrite 14.7
62% 60.5 MB/s
4K Read 5.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1.6
143% 3.03 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 32.1%
Great: 32%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C18 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
90.1% Outstanding
MC Read 33
MC Write 27.1
MC Mixed 35
91% 31.7 GB/s
SC Read 28.1
SC Write 26.7
SC Mixed 37
87% 30.6 GB/s
Latency 72.9
55% 72.9 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 90.1%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 25,889 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 105%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 107%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $170

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $1,147
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11600K $260Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $240Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $350Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $76SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback