Asrock 990FX Extreme9

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 51% Yacht	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	23.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock 990FX Extreme9 (all builds)
Memory	13.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160329
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 04 '21 at 14:16
Run Duration	156 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X6 1055T-$175 23,835 User benchmarks, average bench 54% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	45.7% Average	Memory 59.8 1-Core 43.2 2-Core 86 40% 63 Pts	4-Core 171 8-Core 247 26% 209 Pts	64-Core 237 15% 237 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 45.7% Great: 61%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Gigabyte(1458 3746) CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 461.40 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	23.9% Poor	Lighting 28.9 Reflection 35.7 Parallax 27.2 24% 30.6 fps	MRender 33.8 Gravity 32.2 Splatting 25.8 25% 30.6 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 23.9% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Samsung 840 120GB-$109 51,792 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 5GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXT0AB0Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable		Read 124 Write 115 Mixed 69.4 23% 103 MB/s	4K Read 2.5 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 2.4 8% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 46% Great: 73%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 498GB 5,568 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 464GB free Firmware: 0.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 203 209 199 216 212 144 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	100% Outstanding	Read 151 Write 135 Mixed 114 SusWrite 197 110% 149 MB/s	4K Read 4.2 4K Write 3 4K Mixed 3.1 575% 3.43 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 100% Great: 90%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 223GB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 58 59 59 60 56 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	30.9% Below average	Read 49.2 Write 56.3 Mixed 34.2 SusWrite 58.2 36% 49.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.6 110% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 30.9% Great: 67%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CML8GX3M2A1600C9 CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 CML8GX3M2A1600C9 CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 16GB 254 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 800, 800, 800, 800 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	24.2% Poor	MC Read 9.9 MC Write 6.9 MC Mixed 8.5 24% 8.43 GB/s	SC Read 5.5 SC Write 5.9 SC Mixed 6.9 17% 6.1 GB/s	Latency 128 31% 128 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 24.2% Great: 63%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 990FX Extreme9 Builds (Compare 104 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 31%

Sail boat

Desktop 68%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 25%

Raft

Motherboard: Asrock 990FX Extreme9 - $218

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	48x
FX-9590AMD $298Bench 63%, 26,109 samples	27x
FX-9370AMD $194Bench 62%, 9,054 samples	10x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	8x
R9 290AMD $399Bench 46%, 68,699 samples	5x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	5x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	7x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	4x
PM871 2.5 7mm 256GBSamsungBench 79%, 2,882 samples	4x

RAM
BLS4G3D1609ES2LX0. CT51264BA160BJ.C8F BLS4G3D1609ES2LX0. CT51264BA160BJ.C8F 16GBUnknownBench 29%, 10 samples	4x
Sniper DDR3 1866 C9 4x4GBG.SKILLBench 58%, 5,634 samples	3x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 54% - Above average

Total price: $657

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16