Asus M5A97 R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics8.27% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive100% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus M5A97 R2.0  (all builds)
Memory27.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150626
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 04 '21 at 12:58
Run Duration207 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
62% Good
Memory 72.6
1-Core 77.8
2-Core 150
59% 100 Pts
4-Core 278
8-Core 468
45% 373 Pts
64-Core 448
28% 448 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 62%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-$112
PNY(196E 0974) 2GB
CLim: 1058 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 461.09
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
8.27% Terrible
Lighting 9.2
Reflection 14.1
Parallax 12.9
8% 12.1 fps
MRender 13.7
Gravity 12
Splatting 10.7
10% 12.1 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.27%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
242GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 310 348 301 328 354 331 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 495
Write 341
Mixed 220
SusWrite 329
77% 346 MB/s
4K Read 37
4K Write 74.3
4K Mixed 47.5
156% 52.9 MB/s
DQ Read 283
DQ Write 246
DQ Mixed 23.5
84% 184 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 100%
Great: 129%
Hitachi HDS721616PLA380 165GB-$46
58GB free
Firmware: P22OA50U
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 29 29 29 29 29 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
24.2% Poor
Read 55.6
Write 28.1
Mixed 27.9
SusWrite 28.7
26% 35.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.5
92% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 24.2%
Great: 39%
WD Black 6TB (2015)-$296
5TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 216 218 215 215 215 217 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
123% Outstanding
Read 210
Write 243
Mixed 124
SusWrite 216
145% 198 MB/s
4K Read 6.3
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 1.1
448% 3.6 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 123%
Great: 118%
WD My Book 1140 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 1140
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 101 103 102 102 103 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
41.8% Average
Read 89.9
Write 91.2
Mixed 63.5
SusWrite 99.9
117% 86.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.7
102% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 41.8%
Great: 49%
WD My Book 25EE 8TB
2.5TB free, PID 25ee
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 127 129 128 126 125 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
63.2% Good
Read 142
Write 141
Mixed 86.2
SusWrite 125
165% 123 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 1.5
224% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 63.2%
Great: 98%
WD easystore 25FB 12TB
4TB free, PID 25fb
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 163 161 163 160 162 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
72.5% Very good
Read 151
Write 155
Mixed 92.6
SusWrite 159
189% 140 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 1.6
232% 2.83 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 72.5%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT102464BA160B.M16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1066 MHz clocked @ 533 MHz
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
39.2% Below average
MC Read 15.1
MC Write 14.1
MC Mixed 12.6
40% 13.9 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 8.2
SC Mixed 11.7
28% 9.77 GB/s
Latency 95.4
42% 95.4 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 39.2%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A97 R2.0 Builds (Compare 2,817 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 R2.0 - $89

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $358
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback