Gigabyte GA-H370 AORUS GAMING 3-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 53% Yacht	Desktop 92% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 49% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	54.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	187% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Gigabyte H370AORUSGAMING3
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H370 AORUS GAMING 3-CF (all builds)
Memory	24.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200916
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 04 '21 at 12:21
Run Duration	217 Seconds
Run User	MYS-User
Background CPU	33%

Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8700-$200 349,567 User benchmarks, average bench 87% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	86.9% Excellent	Memory 84.6 1-Core 133 2-Core 259 88% 159 Pts	4-Core 480 8-Core 742 76% 611 Pts	64-Core 1,025 63% 1,025 Pts
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 86.9% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130 360,351 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Sapphire(1DA2 E366) CLim: 1411 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.3.1 Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	54.8% Above average	Lighting 69.9 Reflection 65.6 Parallax 92.8 57% 76.1 fps	MRender 67.1 Gravity 75.3 Splatting 48.4 51% 63.6 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 54.8% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata SX6000LNP 512GB 11,097 User benchmarks, average bench 187% 407GB free (System drive) Firmware: VC0S0285 SusWrite @10s intervals: 1075 1120 1101 953 392 394 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	187% Outstanding	Read 1,211 Write 924 Mixed 806 SusWrite 839 212% 945 MB/s	4K Read 36.7 4K Write 98.2 4K Mixed 47.4 168% 60.8 MB/s	DQ Read 896 DQ Write 712 DQ Mixed 747 575% 785 MB/s
Poor: 83% ↑ This bench: 187% Great: 259%
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 40GB free Firmware: SBFK71B1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 3.5 107 54 52 52 MB/s Performing below potential (25^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	49% Average	Read 259 Write 102 Mixed 117 SusWrite 68.7 30% 137 MB/s	4K Read 20.8 4K Write 54.7 4K Mixed 24.2 92% 33.2 MB/s	DQ Read 99 DQ Write 188 DQ Mixed 158 116% 148 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 49% Great: 100%
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 73GB free Firmware: SBFK71B1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 222 52 52 52 52 54 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	68.5% Good	Read 410 Write 167 Mixed 298 SusWrite 80.8 53% 239 MB/s	4K Read 26.6 4K Write 76.3 4K Mixed 26.8 115% 43.2 MB/s	DQ Read 234 DQ Write 327 DQ Mixed 167 158% 242 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 68.5% Great: 100%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$32 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 216GB free Firmware: CC45 SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 59 48 14 40 84 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	31% Below average	Read 51.5 Write 43.8 Mixed 50.6 SusWrite 56 38% 50.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.6 119% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 31% Great: 112%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$32 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 111GB free Firmware: CC45 SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 35 30 21 9.8 28 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	21.2% Poor	Read 44.9 Write 26.5 Mixed 35.6 SusWrite 28.8 25% 34 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.5 85% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 21.2% Great: 112%
Asmt 2115 2TB 399 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 328GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 103 103 104 103 104 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	62% Good	Read 113 Write 77.1 Mixed 72.8 SusWrite 103 68% 91.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.7 134% 1 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 62% Great: 102%
VendorCo ProductCode 1TB 444 User benchmarks, average bench 8% 970GB free, PID 1234 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Read 22 Mixed 6 12% 14 MB/s	4K Read 3 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0.2 21% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 14%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CMK16GX4M2D3600C18 029E CMK16GX4M2D2666C16 029E CMK16GX4M2D3600C18 029E CMK16GX4M2D2666C16 32GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	71.4% Very good	MC Read 25.4 MC Write 27.1 MC Mixed 22.4 71% 25 GB/s	SC Read 16.3 SC Write 29.8 SC Mixed 23.2 66% 23.1 GB/s	Latency 72.4 55% 72.4 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 71.4% Great: 72%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H370 AORUS GAMING 3-CF Builds (Compare 413 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 53%

Yacht

Desktop 89%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 49%

Yacht

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H370 AORUS GAMING 3-CF

CPU
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	117x
Core i5-8400Intel $131Bench 82%, 312,220 samples	85x
Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	50x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	35x
RTX 3060Nvidia $274Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	28x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	27x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	18x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	15x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	13x

RAM
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	19x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GBCorsair $42Bench 77%, 131,007 samples	17x
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	17x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 96% - Outstanding

Total price: $345

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16