Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512JP_R564JP

Performance Results


Gaming 18% Surfboard	Desktop 86% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 17% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	11.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	196% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

CPU throttled at 86% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

System	Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512JP_R564JP (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK X512JP
Memory	10.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200528
Uptime	23.5 Days
Run Date	Apr 04 '21 at 09:01
Run Duration	125 Seconds
Run User	IRN-User
Background CPU	5%
CPU Throttled	86%

PC Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-1065G7 58,314 User benchmarks, average bench 53% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	84.2% Excellent	Memory 82.3 1-Core 139 2-Core 258 88% 160 Pts	4-Core 468 8-Core 642 70% 555 Pts	64-Core 626 39% 626 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 84.2% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel Iris Plus G7 FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Asus(1043 1B2F) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681 Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	11.1% Very poor	Lighting 15.2 Reflection 18.6 Parallax 16 12% 16.6 fps	MRender 17.2 Gravity 18.9 Splatting 0.2 9% 12.1 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 11.1% Great: 13%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Nvme WDC PC SN520 SDA 256GB 3,002 User benchmarks, average bench 148% 158GB free (System drive) Firmware: 20200000 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 534 423 424 424 422 423 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	196% Outstanding	Read 1,254 Write 1,215 Mixed 1,119 SusWrite 441 226% 1,007 MB/s	4K Read 48.7 4K Write 178 4K Mixed 73.8 263% 100 MB/s	DQ Read 827 DQ Write 851 DQ Mixed 720 574% 799 MB/s
Poor: 102% ↑ This bench: 196% Great: 179%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB 294,991 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 609GB free Firmware: 04.01A04 SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 93 93 91 94 93 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	53.4% Above average	Read 93.4 Write 81.6 Mixed 60.5 SusWrite 92.3 60% 81.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 0.7 163% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 53.4% Great: 79%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 4ATS1G64HZ-2G6E1 Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CWE 16GB 56 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 2667, 3200 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	84.1% Excellent	MC Read 35.3 MC Write 30.4 MC Mixed 24 86% 29.9 GB/s	SC Read 19.3 SC Write 34.8 SC Mixed 26.5 77% 26.9 GB/s	Latency 76.4 52% 76.4 ns
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 84.1% Great: 89%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512JP_R564JP Builds (Compare 33 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 13%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Destroyer

Workstation 12%

Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X512JP_R564JP

CPU
Core i7-1065G7IntelBench 53%, 58,314 samples	24x
Core i5-1035G1IntelBench 51%, 53,170 samples	9x

GPU
Iris Plus G7IntelBench 9%, 52,498 samples	17x
UHD G1IntelBench 5%, 68,603 samples	8x
GeForce MX330NvidiaBench 14%, 4,518 samples	8x

SSD
WDC PC SN520 SDA 256GBNvmeBench 148%, 3,002 samples	16x
WDC PC SN530 SDB 256GBNvmeBench 147%, 1,127 samples	3x
PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G-1202 256GBWDCBench 145%, 4,206 samples	2x

RAM
HMAA1GS6CMR6N-VK HMA81GS6DJR8N-XN 16GBHynixBench 72%, 222 samples	9x
HMAA1GS6CMR6N-VK 1x8GBHynixBench 40%, 1,684 samples	6x
4ATF51264HZ-2G6E1 Samsung M471A5244CB0-CWE 8GBMicronBench 68%, 575 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $33	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16