Asus TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics43.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive91.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory13.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190805
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 03 '21 at 17:58
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User IRN-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700KF-$280
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
89.9% Excellent
Memory 94.1
1-Core 155
2-Core 230
92% 159 Pts
4-Core 460
8-Core 836
78% 648 Pts
64-Core 871
54% 871 Pts
Poor: 84%
This bench: 89.9%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
CLim: 1100 MHz, MLim: 1850 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.2.3
Performing below potential (44th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
43.9% Average
Lighting 56.2
Reflection 56.3
Parallax 70.3
46% 60.9 fps
MRender 58.5
Gravity 54.8
Splatting 39
40% 50.8 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 43.9%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Lexar 128GB SSD 128GB
70GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R1201A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 405 424 435 433 432 418 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
91.1% Outstanding
Read 447
Write 368
Mixed 333
SusWrite 425
88% 393 MB/s
4K Read 37.1
4K Write 76.8
4K Mixed 25.9
130% 46.6 MB/s
DQ Read 172
DQ Write 222
DQ Mixed 35.9
72% 143 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 91.1%
Great: 99%
WDC WD20EZAZ-00GGJB0 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 186 189 187 189 183 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
22.5% Poor
Read 212
Write 134
Mixed 94.3
SusWrite 185
35% 156 MB/s
4K Read 2.3
4K Write 8.2
4K Mixed 0.8
9% 3.77 MB/s
DQ Read 0.8
DQ Write 11.4
DQ Mixed 1.1
2% 4.43 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 22.5%
Great: 23%
SanDisk Ultra Fit 16GB
2GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 15 14 13 14 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
22.9% Poor
Read 122
Write 32.6
Mixed 17.5
SusWrite 14
46% 46.6 MB/s
4K Read 6.5
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 1.3
75% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 22.9%
Great: 28%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
49.8% Average
MC Read 18.4
MC Write 18.2
MC Mixed 12.7
47% 16.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.3
SC Write 18.7
SC Mixed 14.9
47% 16.3 GB/s
Latency 59.5
67% 59.5 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 3,280 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 114%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 114% - Outstanding Total price: $557
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback