MSI X370 GAMING PLUS (MS-7A33)

Performance Results


Gaming 55% Gunboat	Desktop 84% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 54% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	59.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	112% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (88%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Micro-Star MS-7A33
Motherboard	MSI X370 GAMING PLUS (MS-7A33) (all builds)
Memory	13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200701
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 03 '21 at 16:51
Run Duration	129 Seconds
Run User	BEL-User
Background CPU	88%

Watch Gameplay: 1650S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 2700-$185 123,820 User benchmarks, average bench 74% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	80.4% Excellent	Memory 82.1 1-Core 104 2-Core 213 75% 133 Pts	4-Core 423 8-Core 765 71% 594 Pts	64-Core 1,068 66% 1,068 Pts
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 80.4% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$295 180,577 User benchmarks, average bench 59% Gigabyte(1458 401A) CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 461.92 Performing below potential (78^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	59.9% Above average	Lighting 77.6 Reflection 78 Parallax 75 63% 76.9 fps	MRender 63.6 Gravity 73.9 Splatting 60.2 54% 65.9 fps
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 59.9% Great: 62%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Mushkin MKNSSDHL250GB-D8 250GB 554 User benchmarks, average bench 160% 177GB free (System drive) Firmware: S1111A0L SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 78 563 94 128 141 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	112% Outstanding	Read 1,060 Write 490 Mixed 686 SusWrite 178 133% 604 MB/s	4K Read 44.9 4K Write 11.3 4K Mixed 18.6 98% 24.9 MB/s	DQ Read 766 DQ Write 614 DQ Mixed 460 407% 613 MB/s
Poor: 89% ↑ This bench: 112% Great: 199%
USB DISK 2.0 16GB 1,213 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 14GB free, PID 9917 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.5 3.1 4 5.5 5.5 5.5 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	4.56% Terrible	Read 14.9 Write 5.2 Mixed 4.7 SusWrite 4.5 8% 7.32 MB/s	4K Read 4.7 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0 21% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.56% Great: 10%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB 37,374 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	107% Outstanding	MC Read 44.2 MC Write 41.1 MC Mixed 33.5 113% 39.6 GB/s	SC Read 22.9 SC Write 35.9 SC Mixed 29.3 84% 29.4 GB/s	Latency 76.7 52% 76.7 ns
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 107%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X370 GAMING PLUS (MS-7A33) Builds (Compare 850 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 45%

Yacht

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 42%

Speed boat

Motherboard: MSI X370 GAMING PLUS (MS-7A33)

CPU
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	102x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	100x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $125Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	81x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	76x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	65x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	64x

SSD
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	27x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	22x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	21x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	67x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	35x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	18x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $400

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16