Asrock FM2A88M Extreme4+

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	29% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock FM2A88M Extreme4+ (all builds)
Memory	6.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20160205
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 03 '21 at 12:17
Run Duration	163 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A10-7850K APU (2014 D.Ka)-$135 19,875 User benchmarks, average bench 45% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 4 GHz Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	56.2% Above average	Memory 73.7 1-Core 72 2-Core 131 56% 92.1 Pts	4-Core 225 8-Core 227 30% 226 Pts	64-Core 223 14% 223 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 56.2% Great: 54%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Asus(1043 85D6) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 465.89 Performing below potential (59^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	29% Poor	Lighting 36.3 Reflection 48.2 Parallax 38.3 30% 40.9 fps	MRender 38.9 Gravity 38.5 Splatting 27.4 28% 34.9 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 29% Great: 33%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
INTENSO 256GB 4,055 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 176GB free (System drive) Firmware: T070 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 358 Write 323 Mixed 301 73% 327 MB/s	4K Read 31.4 4K Write 90.7 4K Mixed 27 130% 49.7 MB/s	DQ Read 154 DQ Write 219 DQ Mixed 40.6 72% 138 MB/s
Poor: 38% Great: 100%
Adata S510 120GB 690 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 64GB free Firmware: 3.3. Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	Read 149 Write 116 Mixed 126 29% 131 MB/s	4K Read 29 4K Write 94.9 4K Mixed 31.6 135% 51.8 MB/s	DQ Read 141 DQ Write 113 DQ Mixed 116 90% 123 MB/s
Poor: 49% Great: 79%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 750GB-$55 4,103 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 699GB free Firmware: JC4B Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 2,606 Write 51.3 Mixed 84.3 656% 914 MB/s	4K Read 432 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 3 18,368% 146 MB/s
Poor: 30% Great: 67%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB 16,472 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (11^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	37.8% Below average	MC Read 16.8 MC Write 8.7 MC Mixed 14.8 38% 13.4 GB/s	SC Read 8.5 SC Write 8.5 SC Mixed 10.3 26% 9.1 GB/s	Latency 93.1 43% 93.1 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 37.8% Great: 63%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical FM2A88M Extreme4+ Builds (Compare 89 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 50%

Yacht

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A88M Extreme4+ - $93

CPU
A10-7850K APU (2014 D.Ka)AMD $135Bench 45%, 19,875 samples	19x
Athlon II X4 860KAMD $51Bench 45%, 29,887 samples	11x
A8-6600K APUAMD $88Bench 50%, 21,890 samples	8x

GPU
GTX 650Nvidia $112Bench 8%, 69,673 samples	8x
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 6%, 25,284 samples	8x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	5x

SSD
S101 256GBFanxiangBench 63%, 810 samples	7x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	4x
SSDNow V300 240GBKingston $35Bench 64%, 176,713 samples	3x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x4GBHyperX $35Bench 51%, 38,490 samples	4x
Ballistix Sport DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCrucialBench 56%, 44,086 samples	3x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 41% - Average

Total price: $375

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16