MSI X299 RAIDER (MS-7A94)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics48.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive250% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7A94
MotherboardMSI X299 RAIDER (MS-7A94)  (all builds)
Memory26 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200601
Uptime3.9 Days
Run DateApr 03 '21 at 04:53
Run Duration176 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7740X-$281
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.8 GHz, turbo 5.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
89.8% Excellent
Memory 89
1-Core 153
2-Core 268
95% 170 Pts
4-Core 487
8-Core 840
80% 663 Pts
64-Core 844
52% 844 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 89.8%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$407
Nvidia(10DE 1302) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.71
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (60 fps cap detected)
48.8% Average
Lighting 59.8
Reflection 59.8
Parallax 59.7
49% 59.8 fps
MRender 59.8
Gravity 59.8
Splatting 59.8
49% 59.8 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 134%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Plextor PX-256M9PeGN 256GB
118GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.07
SusWrite @10s intervals: 801 708 809 680 598 786 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
250% Outstanding
Read 2,040
Write 17.4
Mixed 132
SusWrite 730
156% 730 MB/s
4K Read 67.5
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 83.1
268% 87.5 MB/s
DQ Read 779
DQ Write 1,032
DQ Mixed 721
596% 844 MB/s
Poor: 110%
This bench: 250%
Great: 211%
Patriot P300 1TB
952GB free
Firmware: S1111A0L
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1576 1589 1571 1598 1602 1602 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
263% Outstanding
Read 1,427
Write 1596
Mixed 984
SusWrite 1,590
316% 1,399 MB/s
4K Read 49
4K Write 223
4K Mixed 27
227% 99.5 MB/s
DQ Read 900
DQ Write 1,097
DQ Mixed 474
503% 824 MB/s
Poor: 105%
This bench: 263%
Great: 253%
Spcc M.2 SSD 512GB
312GB free
Firmware: H190505
SusWrite @10s intervals: 473 456 450 456 389 355 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
119% Outstanding
Read 492
Write 491
Mixed 449
SusWrite 430
105% 465 MB/s
4K Read 44.5
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 53.2
194% 69 MB/s
DQ Read 294
DQ Write 291
DQ Mixed 318
232% 301 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 119%
Great: 96%
Samsung HD502HJ 500GB-$50
342GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 115 118 118 118 118 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
62.4% Good
Read 99.9
Write 129
Mixed 50.5
SusWrite 117
72% 99.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 0.9
179% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 62.4%
Great: 77%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC27
SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 191 193 192 192 192 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 169
Write 133
Mixed 85.9
SusWrite 191
106% 145 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
140% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 103%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G4D240FSB.16FBD2 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
80.3% Excellent
MC Read 28.5
MC Write 31
MC Mixed 24.1
80% 27.9 GB/s
SC Read 19.8
SC Write 33.8
SC Mixed 28.7
78% 27.4 GB/s
Latency 68.4
58% 68.4 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 80.3%
Great: 101%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X299 RAIDER (MS-7A94) Builds (Compare 901 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 92%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: MSI X299 RAIDER (MS-7A94)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $791
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback