| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 16.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 34.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asrock N68-GS4/USB3 FX (all builds) |
| Memory | 12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20141002 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Apr 02 '21 at 16:38 |
| Run Duration | 129 Seconds |
| Run User | NLD-User |
| Background CPU | 25% |
PC Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
53%
Above average
|
47% 74.3 Pts
|
28% 223 Pts
|
16% 254 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 950-$100
CLim: 1443 MHz, MLim: 1652 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
16.9%
Very poor
|
16% 20.4 fps
|
18% 23.1 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
106GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 24 64 88 28 108 MB/s
|
34.2%
Below average
|
33% 148 MB/s
|
64% 21.6 MB/s
|
22% 31.8 MB/s
|
|
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31
820GB free
Firmware: MS2O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 110 109 113 114 114 MB/s
|
64.9%
Good
|
68% 94.2 MB/s
|
128% 1.13 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM 1066 MHz
|
36.6%
Below average
|
38% 13.2 GB/s
|
22% 7.77 GB/s
|
43% 93.2 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical N68-GS4/USB3 FX Builds (Compare 33 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock N68-GS4/USB3 FX
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 12x |
| FX-8320EAMD $87Bench 58%, 33,199 samples | 8x |
| FX-4130 Quad-CoreAMD $150Bench 52%, 8,564 samples | 4x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 4x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 4x |
| GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples | 4x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 43% - Average | Total price: $248 |