Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive	35.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2500 82,538 User benchmarks, average bench 63% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	72.7% Very good	Memory 83.8 1-Core 93.2 2-Core 183 70% 120 Pts	4-Core 357 8-Core 353 48% 355 Pts	64-Core 355 22% 355 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 72.7% Great: 72%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
INTENSO 256GB 4,055 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 103GB free (System drive) Firmware: S8FM06.6 SusWrite @10s intervals: 293 299 28 27 46 164 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	35.4% Below average	Read 185 Write 294 Mixed 122 SusWrite 143 42% 186 MB/s	4K Read 11.6 4K Write 38.4 4K Mixed 14.5 56% 21.5 MB/s	DQ Read 14.8 DQ Write 76.8 DQ Mixed 17.2 22% 36.3 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 35.4% Great: 100%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83 138,859 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 10GB free Firmware: 1AJ100E4 SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 104 104 108 103 104 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	54.6% Above average	Read 86.5 Write 72.8 Mixed 58.5 SusWrite 104 59% 80.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 0.8 154% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 54.6% Great: 75%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws DDR3 1333 C9 3x4GB 190 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 3 of 4 slots used 12GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	26.6% Poor	MC Read 8.8 MC Write 8.3 MC Mixed 7.7 24% 8.27 GB/s	SC Read 8.5 SC Write 6.6 SC Mixed 9.7 24% 8.27 GB/s	Latency 73.7 54% 73.7 ns
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 26.6% Great: 50%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 24%

Surfboard

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 20%

Surfboard

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	18x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	16x
RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBG.SKILLBench 53%, 47,852 samples	12x

Value: 77% - Very good

Total price: $432

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16