Gigabyte GA-990FXA-UD3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-990FXA-UD3  (all builds)
Memory7.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150528
Uptime1.7 Days
Run DateApr 02 '21 at 12:49
Run Duration230 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8320-$129
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
69.5% Good
Memory 89.3
1-Core 67.8
2-Core 131
60% 96.1 Pts
4-Core 270
8-Core 419
42% 344 Pts
64-Core 411
26% 411 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 69.5%
Great: 65%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Netac SS D 1TB
445GB free
Firmware: T031
SusWrite @10s intervals: 387 395 394 392 391 392 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
86.6% Excellent
Read 397
Write 397
Mixed 387
SusWrite 392
89% 393 MB/s
4K Read 30
4K Write 80.8
4K Mixed 29.5
126% 46.8 MB/s
DQ Read 163
DQ Write 228
DQ Mixed 47.7
77% 146 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 86.6%
Great: 108%
WDC WDS2 40G2G0A-00JH30 240GB
89GB free
Firmware: UF45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 380 129 120 137 145 143 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
54.8% Above average
Read 412
Write 374
Mixed 290
SusWrite 176
70% 313 MB/s
4K Read 22.2
4K Write 39
4K Mixed 18.7
78% 26.6 MB/s
DQ Read 116
DQ Write 57
DQ Mixed 40.7
42% 71.4 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 54.8%
Great: 56%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29
112GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 82 82 82 81 80 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
46.9% Average
Read 81.5
Write 81.3
Mixed 58.5
SusWrite 81.6
56% 75.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
179% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 46.9%
Great: 69%
Samsung Spinpoint T166 500GB-$40
67GB free
Firmware: CR10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 63 63 64 64 64 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
35.4% Below average
Read 59.3
Write 28.8
Mixed 18
SusWrite 63.9
31% 42.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.8
137% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 35.4%
Great: 44%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83
81GB free
Firmware: 1AJ1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 108 109 107 109 108 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
53.7% Above average
Read 77.8
Write 25.2
Mixed 49.5
SusWrite 109
48% 65.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.2
213% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 53.7%
Great: 75%
Seagate BUP Slim 500GB
455GB free, PID ab24
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 115 114 115 115 115 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
45.8% Average
Read 115
Write 113
Mixed 47
SusWrite 115
129% 97.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
73% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 45.8%
Great: 45%
Seagate Backup+ Desk 3TB
2.5TB free, PID ab34
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 135 135 134 135 137 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
59.4% Above average
Read 168
Write 147
Mixed 67.5
SusWrite 134
168% 129 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
95% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 59.4%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351U6BFR8C Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4 HMT351U6BFR8C Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4 16GB
667, 800, 667, 800 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
45.3% Average
MC Read 17.9
MC Write 14.9
MC Mixed 15.2
46% 16 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 12.3
29% 10.2 GB/s
Latency 68.1
59% 68.1 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 45.3%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-990FXA-UD3 Builds (Compare 1,400 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-990FXA-UD3 - $100

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $440
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback