Asus P8B75-M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics1.85% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive72.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus P8B75-M  (all builds)
Memory13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120803
Uptime14.2 Days
Run DateApr 02 '21 at 04:03
Run Duration204 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
78.5% Very good
Memory 91.8
1-Core 106
2-Core 208
78% 135 Pts
4-Core 353
8-Core 520
54% 436 Pts
64-Core 520
32% 520 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 78.5%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 610
Gigabyte(1458 3623) 2GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 333 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
1.85% Terrible
Lighting 2.2
Reflection 2.9
Parallax 0.5
2% 1.87 fps
MRender 2.8
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 2.1
2% 2.43 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.85%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
41GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 357 234 248 243 236 227 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
72.6% Very good
Read 366
Write 392
Mixed 336
SusWrite 257
76% 338 MB/s
4K Read 35.6
4K Write 44.8
4K Mixed 36.9
125% 39.1 MB/s
DQ Read 41
DQ Write 108
DQ Mixed 54.3
47% 67.7 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 72.6%
Great: 128%
Kingston HyperX 3K 120GB-$100
58GB free
Firmware: 502ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 80 76 69 78 78 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
35.5% Below average
Read 194
Write 88.8
Mixed 123
SusWrite 79.5
27% 121 MB/s
4K Read 25.6
4K Write 14.7
4K Mixed 19.3
71% 19.9 MB/s
DQ Read 28.9
DQ Write 17.4
DQ Mixed 22.6
17% 23 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 35.5%
Great: 87%
Seagate ST380815AS 80GB-$32
37GB free
Firmware: 3.AAC
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 58 61 61 61 61 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
34.9% Below average
Read 61
Write 29.8
Mixed 36.8
SusWrite 60.5
35% 47 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 34.9%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-030.A00LF 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
51.1% Above average
MC Read 18.2
MC Write 17.3
MC Mixed 16
49% 17.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 17.4
SC Mixed 17
47% 16.3 GB/s
Latency 64.5
62% 64.5 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8B75-M Builds (Compare 1,496 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P8B75-M - $470

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $906
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback