HP 655 Notebook PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 29%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.06% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive50.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP 655 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1885
Memory5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130521
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 02 '21 at 00:57
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD E2-1800 APU (2012 M.Za)
Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 1.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
28.6% Poor
Memory 50.6
1-Core 18.9
2-Core 40.8
26% 36.8 Pts
4-Core 41.7
8-Core 40.2
6% 41 Pts
64-Core 41.5
3% 41.5 Pts
Poor: 12%
This bench: 28.6%
Great: 39%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7340
HP(103C 1885) 384MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.06% Terrible
Lighting 1.2
Reflection 1.9
Parallax 1.7
1% 1.6 fps
MRender 1.9
Gravity 0.5
Splatting 1.9
1% 1.43 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.06%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 960GB-$48
861GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900613
SusWrite @10s intervals: 284 284 302 308 317 313 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
50.8% Above average
Read 361
Write 120
Mixed 255
SusWrite 302
58% 260 MB/s
4K Read 10.7
4K Write 19.9
4K Mixed 12.6
43% 14.4 MB/s
DQ Read 111
DQ Write 99
DQ Mixed 104
78% 105 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 50.8%
Great: 104%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351S6CFR8C-PB GR1600S3V64L11S/4G 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
13.3% Very poor
MC Read 4.4
MC Write 3.7
MC Mixed 4.9
12% 4.33 GB/s
SC Read 3
SC Write 3.2
SC Mixed 3.9
10% 3.37 GB/s
Latency 158
25% 158 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 655 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 40 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 25%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP 655 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 40% - Average Total price: $48
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback