| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
| Graphics | 29.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| Motherboard | Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0 (all builds) |
| Memory | 3.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20190304 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Apr 01 '21 at 12:55 |
| Run Duration | 91 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 0% |
PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
37.8%
Below average
|
41% 71 Pts
|
28% 207 Pts
|
16% 260 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 461.92
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
29.4%
Poor
|
30% 37.7 fps
|
28% 35.3 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown BLS8G4D30AESBK.M8FE CL16-18-18 D4-3000 16GB
0, 0 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
|
62.9%
Good
|
68% 23.9 GB/s
|
46% 16.1 GB/s
|
19% 209 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical A320M-HDV R4.0 Builds (Compare 5,978 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Ryzen 5 2600AMD $125Bench 73%, 179,588 samples | 866x |
| Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $75Bench 63%, 104,122 samples | 714x |
| Ryzen 5 3600AMD $84Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples | 543x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples | 454x |
| RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 423x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 402x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 92% - Outstanding | Total price: $323 |