Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 4GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP Compaq dc7800 Ultra-slim Desktop (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 0AA4h
Memory	2.7 GB free of 4.00391 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20151023
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 01 '21 at 11:35
Run Duration	133 Seconds
Run User	LTU-User
Background CPU	35%

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo E6750 9,456 User benchmarks, average bench 38% XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	40.1% Average	Memory 71.4 1-Core 30 2-Core 54.7 37% 52 Pts	4-Core 54.9 8-Core 53.4 7% 54.2 Pts	64-Core 60.2 4% 60.2 Pts
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 40.1% Great: 44%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate ST9160823AS 160GB-$51 538 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 65GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3.BHD SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.7 6.9 8.8 8.7 9.6 10 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	13% Very poor	Read 36.5 Write 10.5 Mixed 14.4 SusWrite 8.5 13% 17.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.6 101% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 13% Great: 32%
Generic Flash Disk 2GB 353 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 2GB free, PID 7788 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.2 3.4 3.3 7.2 3.4 3.3 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	2.89% Terrible	Read 8.2 Write 2.7 Mixed 2.5 SusWrite 4 5% 4.35 MB/s	4K Read 3.5 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 13% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.89% Great: 16%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 40GB 7,939 User benchmarks, average bench 22% null MHz 2048, 2048, 36864 MB Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	19.2% Very poor	MC Read 6.7 MC Write 5.6 MC Mixed 5.5 17% 5.93 GB/s	SC Read 5.5 SC Write 5.7 SC Mixed 6 16% 5.73 GB/s	Latency 98.1 41% 98.1 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 19.2% Great: 49%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16