| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 28.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 31% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
| System | ECT One Computer AMD FX-6300, 6x (all builds) |
| Motherboard | ASUSTeK EX-A320M-GAMING |
| Memory | 8.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20190912 |
| Uptime | 1.9 Days |
| Run Date | Apr 01 '21 at 09:25 |
| Run Duration | 117 Seconds |
| Run User | DEU-User |
| Background CPU | 30% |
PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
77.9%
Very good
|
76% 133 Pts
|
65% 529 Pts
|
55% 884 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Nvidia(10DE 1C82) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 461.40
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
28.7%
Poor
|
29% 38.1 fps
|
27% 34.3 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Apacer AS350 512GB
352GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1127B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 71 29 34 42 40 MB/s
|
31%
Below average
|
36% 164 MB/s
|
39% 9.3 MB/s
| |
|
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
494GB free
Firmware: 03.01A03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 171 171 170 171 172 MB/s
|
99.4%
Outstanding
|
111% 151 MB/s
|
233% 1.7 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
|
97.3%
Outstanding
|
102% 35.5 GB/s
|
80% 28.2 GB/s
|
51% 78.1 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical One Computer AMD FX-6300, 6x Builds (Compare 11 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: ECT One Computer AMD FX-6300, 6x
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Ryzen 5 3600AMD $83Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples | 2x |
| Ryzen 5 2600AMD $155Bench 73%, 179,588 samples | 1x |
| Ryzen 5 1600AFAMD $97Bench 72%, 52,721 samples | 1x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| RTX 2060S (Super)Nvidia $510Bench 100%, 319,148 samples | 3x |
| RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples | 2x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 1x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 63% - Good | Total price: $683 |