Asus N43SL

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop 10%
Tree trunk
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (6th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 94 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 8.26%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics2.13% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus N43SL  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK N43SL
Memory1.1 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110921
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateMar 31 '21 at 02:27
Run Duration750 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i5-2430M-$55
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
8.26% Terrible
Memory 12.6
1-Core 16.5
2-Core 25.1
11% 18.1 Pts
4-Core 21.9
8-Core 32.3
4% 27.1 Pts
64-Core 28.3
2% 28.3 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 8.26%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 540M
Asus(1043 15F2) 2GB
Driver: nvumdshimx.dll Ver.
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
2.13% Terrible
Lighting 1.1
Reflection 5.7
Parallax 2
1% 2.93 fps
MRender 5.7
Gravity 4.2
Splatting 3.2
4% 4.37 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.13%
Great: 3%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
WD Black 2.5" 750GB (2011)-$90
498GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 65 85 82 58 82 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
35% Below average
Read 53
Write 43.8
Mixed 50.2
SusWrite 68.6
40% 53.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
124% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 35%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown AM1U16BC4P2-B19N Hynix HMT325S6BFR8C-H9 6GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
16.1% Very poor
MC Read 5.4
MC Write 5.6
MC Mixed 7.3
17% 6.1 GB/s
SC Read 2.3
SC Write 4.1
SC Mixed 3.6
10% 3.33 GB/s
Latency 381
10% 381 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical N43SL Builds (Compare 156 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop 53%
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus N43SL

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $237
The Best.
Intel Core i5-11400F $239Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $38
Intel Core i7-10700K $304Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $85SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback