Asrock X99X Killer

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (7th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 93 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics67% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock X99X Killer  (all builds)
Memory120.5 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180406
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 28 '21 at 16:44
Run Duration175 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6800K-$103
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 1.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
42.4% Average
Memory 59.4
1-Core 39.1
2-Core 75.6
37% 58 Pts
4-Core 138
8-Core 252
23% 195 Pts
64-Core 728
45% 728 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 42.4%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega-64-$400
CLim: 1630 MHz, MLim: 945 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
67% Good
Lighting 75.2
Reflection 95.8
Parallax 174
61% 115 fps
MRender 91.5
Gravity 124
Splatting 76.9
78% 97.4 fps
Poor: 77%
This bench: 67%
Great: 94%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX200 480GB-$160
317GB free
Firmware: MU01.6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 240 136 69 70 68 67 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
55.9% Above average
Read 389
Write 84.7
Mixed 126
SusWrite 108
39% 177 MB/s
4K Read 24.8
4K Write 45.5
4K Mixed 26
95% 32.1 MB/s
DQ Read 124
DQ Write 78.5
DQ Mixed 93
72% 98.6 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 95%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
29GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 37 37 36 37 37 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
Mushkin Reactor 1TB-$50
249GB free
Firmware: N1007C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 242 295 295 294 296 298 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
69.8% Good
Read 450
Write 395
Mixed 294
SusWrite 287
80% 356 MB/s
4K Read 19.4
4K Write 42.8
4K Mixed 26.2
86% 29.5 MB/s
DQ Read 191
DQ Write 147
DQ Mixed 137
111% 158 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 69.8%
Great: 105%
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$139
185GB free
Firmware: 4B6Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 351 345 341 354 346 352 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
154% Outstanding
Read 1,856
Write 1091
Mixed 885
SusWrite 348
231% 1,045 MB/s
4K Read 33.4
4K Write 64
4K Mixed 42.2
139% 46.5 MB/s
DQ Read 365
DQ Write 310
DQ Mixed 335
252% 337 MB/s
Poor: 159%
This bench: 154%
Great: 353%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 8x16GB
8 of 8 slots used
128GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
97.9% Outstanding
MC Read 36.5
MC Write 44.4
MC Mixed 41.4
116% 40.8 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 6.8
SC Mixed 9.8
23% 7.93 GB/s
Latency 129
31% 129 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 97.9%
Great: 186%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99X Killer Builds (Compare 264 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 84%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 75%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock X99X Killer - $350

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $923
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback