Asus P5B-PLUS Series

Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 42% Speed boat	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	2.03% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	53.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P5B-PLUS Series (all builds)
Memory	4.3 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1366x768x4294967296 szín
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20071127
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 28 '21 at 15:38
Run Duration	174 Seconds
Run User	HUN-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 6600-$90 8,894 User benchmarks, average bench 37% Socket 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	42.7% Average	Memory 76.7 1-Core 27.6 2-Core 54 38% 52.8 Pts	4-Core 54.6 8-Core 54.8 7% 54.7 Pts	64-Core 55 3% 55 Pts
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 42.7% Great: 43%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 8600 GT 8,099 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Gainward(10B0 0801) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.01 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	2.03% Terrible	Lighting 2.2 Reflection 1.6 Parallax 0.7 2% 1.5 fps	MRender 4 Gravity 1.9 Splatting 3.2 2% 3.03 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.03% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SUV500240G 240GB 13,649 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 193GB free (System drive) Firmware: 003056RR SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 147 103 112 126 101 MB/s Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	53.3% Above average	Read 224 Write 218 Mixed 187 SusWrite 129 43% 189 MB/s	4K Read 28.2 4K Write 47.1 4K Mixed 32.3 109% 35.9 MB/s	DQ Read 35.4 DQ Write 76.4 DQ Mixed 42.4 36% 51.4 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 53.3% Great: 89%
Seagate ST3160815AS 160GB-$46 33,785 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 116GB free Firmware: 3.AAC SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 66 68 68 69 66 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	39.6% Below average	Read 70.5 Write 68 Mixed 43.3 SusWrite 67.4 46% 62.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.9 153% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 39.6% Great: 42%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 16GB-$7 60,636 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 7GB free, PID 1666 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.3 6 4.8 8.4 8.4 8.4 MB/s Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Read 9 Write 8.8 SusWrite 6.9 10% 8.23 MB/s	4K Read 3.3 4K Mixed 0 18% 1.65 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 23%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 6GB 111,301 User benchmarks, average bench 25% null MHz 1024, 2048, 1024, 2048 MB Performing below potential (35^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	17.8% Very poor	MC Read 6.5 MC Write 4.6 MC Mixed 4.8 15% 5.3 GB/s	SC Read 5.5 SC Write 4.5 SC Mixed 5.1 14% 5.03 GB/s	Latency 86.8 46% 86.8 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 17.8% Great: 46%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P5B-PLUS Series Builds (Compare 16 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 12%

Tree trunk

Desktop 59%

Gunboat

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5B-PLUS Series

CPU
Core2 Extreme X9650Intel $850Bench 53%, 3,122 samples	2x
Core2 Quad Q9650Intel $170Bench 51%, 16,719 samples	2x
Core2 Quad Q9550Intel $161Bench 49%, 34,093 samples	2x

GPU
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	2x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	2x
Radeon HD 5670AMDBench 6%, 18,196 samples	2x

SSD
CS1311 240GBPNY $78Bench 81%, 26,547 samples	2x
MX500 250GBCrucial $40Bench 101%, 77,177 samples	2x
840 Pro 128GBSamsung $150Bench 90%, 34,842 samples	1x

RAM
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	10x
6GBUnknownBench 25%, 111,301 samples	2x
3x2GBUnknownBench 30%, 45,030 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 37% - Below average

Total price: $1,020

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16