Asus H81M-K

Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 80% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (95th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 5 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	17.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	98.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asus H81M-K (all builds)
Memory	1.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180326
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 28 '21 at 00:12
Run Duration	128 Seconds
Run User	CHL-User
Background CPU	3%

PC Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-4130-$42 49,509 User benchmarks, average bench 52% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	70.4% Very good	Memory 96.2 1-Core 99.7 2-Core 182 75% 126 Pts	4-Core 266 8-Core 235 34% 250 Pts	64-Core 263 16% 263 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 70.4% Great: 63%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-$120 66,662 User benchmarks, average bench 15% Asus(1043 84B3) 1GB CLim: 1573 MHz, MLim: 1442 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 461.92 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	17.6% Very poor	Lighting 21.2 Reflection 20.7 Parallax 20.3 17% 20.7 fps	MRender 27.6 Gravity 22.1 Splatting 18.5 18% 22.7 fps
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 17.6% Great: 16%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Lexar 128GB SSD 128GB 8,135 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 66GB free (System drive) Firmware: H190117D SusWrite @10s intervals: 430 267 130 132 131 65 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	98.9% Outstanding	Read 486 Write 465 Mixed 434 SusWrite 193 88% 395 MB/s	4K Read 42.7 4K Write 106 4K Mixed 47.4 182% 65.5 MB/s	DQ Read 239 DQ Write 301 DQ Mixed 237 188% 259 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 98.9% Great: 99%
Generic External 1TB 2,077 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 778GB free, PID 0840 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 38 39 39 39 38 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	21% Poor	Read 39.5 Write 36.8 Mixed 30.5 SusWrite 38.5 49% 36.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.9 107% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 21% Great: 29%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5471-002.A01LF 9905471-001.A01LF 4GB 51 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 1200, 1200 MHz 2048, 2048 MB Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	62.6% Good	MC Read 20.8 MC Write 23.2 MC Mixed 20.2 61% 21.4 GB/s	SC Read 16.6 SC Write 18.7 SC Mixed 19.7 52% 18.3 GB/s	Latency 53.4 75% 53.4 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 62.6% Great: 53%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H81M-K Builds (Compare 6,101 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H81M-K - $50

CPU
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples	1,181x
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	500x
Core i5-4590Intel $188Bench 63%, 151,366 samples	489x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	565x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	477x
HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 64,721 samples	413x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	346x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	167x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	149x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	147x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 1x8GBKingstonBench 31%, 37,489 samples	91x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	89x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $287

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16