HP SG3-345FR-m

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.65% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (54%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP SG3-345FR-m  (all builds)
MotherboardFOXCONN 2AAF
Memory0.7 GB free of 3 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100423
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 26 '21 at 16:02
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 54%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD Athlon II X2 245
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
47.7% Average
Memory 79
1-Core 50.5
2-Core 103
50% 77.4 Pts
4-Core 97
8-Core 104
14% 101 Pts
64-Core 100
7% 100 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
ATI Radeon 3000 Graphics
HP(103C 2AA9) 256MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
0.65% Terrible
Lighting 0.8
Reflection 1
Parallax 0.5
1% 0.77 fps
MRender 0.8
Gravity 0.8
Splatting 0.5
1% 0.7 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.65%
Great: 1%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Hitachi HDS721075CLA332 750GB-$299
559GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JP3O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 23 14 10 5.5 7.8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
23.2% Poor
Read 69.1
Write 36.5
Mixed 30.3
SusWrite 12
27% 37 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.2
34% 0.2 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 23.2%
Great: 77%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Samsung M378B2873FH0-CH9 Micron 8JTF25664AZ-1G4D1 3GB
1066, 1066 MHz
1024, 2048 MB
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
25.9% Poor
MC Read 10.3
MC Write 6.7
MC Mixed 8.5
24% 8.5 GB/s
SC Read 6.2
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 7
18% 6.43 GB/s
Latency 82.4
48% 82.4 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 25.9%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical SG3-345FR-m Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming 0%
Desktop 0%
Workstation 0%

System: HP SG3-345FR-m

The Best.
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $211Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $380Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $73SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $77SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $72G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback