Asus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics32.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200714
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 26 '21 at 11:02
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$83
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
81.9% Excellent
Memory 64.4
1-Core 143
2-Core 277
85% 161 Pts
4-Core 533
8-Core 785
82% 659 Pts
64-Core 1,070
66% 1,070 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 81.9%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Asus(1043 8561) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 460.79
Performing below potential (65th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
32.9% Below average
Lighting 42
Reflection 44.1
Parallax 39.7
34% 41.9 fps
MRender 37.1
Gravity 39.5
Splatting 34.9
30% 37.2 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 32.9%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Plextor M5 Pro 128GB-$130
8GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.02
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 493
Write 316
Mixed 292
81% 367 MB/s
4K Read 32.4
4K Write 78.4
4K Mixed 40.5
142% 50.4 MB/s
DQ Read 343
DQ Write 303
DQ Mixed 198
182% 281 MB/s
Poor: 63% Great: 98%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49
105GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 60 59 61 60 60 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
45.9% Average
Read 99.8
Write 98.9
Mixed 102
SusWrite 59.9
67% 90.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
152% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 45.9%
Great: 76%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
548GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 154 157 159 159 157 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
85.6% Excellent
Read 143
Write 135
Mixed 66.3
SusWrite 156
91% 125 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
127% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 85.6%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$43
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
65.6% Good
MC Read 28.4
MC Write 17.9
MC Mixed 25.6
68% 24 GB/s
SC Read 19.5
SC Write 17.2
SC Mixed 19.8
54% 18.8 GB/s
Latency 115
35% 115 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 65.6%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,021 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $475
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback