Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509MA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.37% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive84.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509MA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X509MA
Memory0.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200113
Uptime1.3 Days
Run DateMar 25 '21 at 17:02
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 39%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium Silver N5000
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
37.6% Below average
Memory 45.1
1-Core 40.1
2-Core 108
36% 64.3 Pts
4-Core 172
8-Core 185
24% 179 Pts
64-Core 189
12% 189 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 37.6%
Great: 44%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 605
Asus(1043 1D91) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
2.37% Terrible
Lighting 2.9
Reflection 1
Parallax 3.7
2% 2.53 fps
MRender 2.7
Gravity 3.4
Splatting 2.7
2% 2.93 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.37%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G-1202 256GB
60GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20200000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 272 181 230 222 210 228 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
84.5% Excellent
Read 508
Write 460
Mixed 492
SusWrite 224
94% 421 MB/s
4K Read 30.9
4K Write 19.2
4K Mixed 39.2
107% 29.8 MB/s
DQ Read 396
DQ Write 331
DQ Mixed 378
279% 368 MB/s
Poor: 85%
This bench: 84.5%
Great: 189%
SDHC Card 32GB
11GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.5 9.9 13 13 13 13 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
8.4% Terrible
Read 24.4
Write 12.2
Mixed 19.4
SusWrite 12.1
22% 17 MB/s
4K Read 2.9
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.6
48% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 8.4%
Great: 33%
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 494GB
399GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 19 21 21 20 22 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
12% Very poor
Read 34.3
Write 19.2
Mixed 10.2
SusWrite 19.8
26% 20.9 MB/s
4K Read 4.8
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.8
62% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 12%
Great: 38%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
SK_Hynix HMA851S6JJR6N-VK 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
17.5% Very poor
MC Read 6.3
MC Write 7.5
MC Mixed 6.3
19% 6.7 GB/s
SC Read 2.1
SC Write 2.1
SC Mixed 0.6
5% 1.6 GB/s
Latency 180
22% 180 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 17.5%
Great: 25%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509MA Builds (Compare 125 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 27%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X509MA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback