Razer Blade 15 Mid 2019-Base

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics2.26% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive108% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemRazer Blade 15 Mid 2019-Base  (all builds)
MotherboardRazer DA530
Memory10 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190606
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 25 '21 at 04:11
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 30%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
75.1% Very good
Memory 92
1-Core 37.4
2-Core 116
52% 81.9 Pts
4-Core 315
8-Core 452
48% 384 Pts
64-Core 467
29% 467 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 75.1%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Device(1A58 2004) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7261
Relative performance (0th percentile)
2.26% Terrible
Lighting 2.4
Reflection 30
Parallax 2.7
2% 11.7 fps
MRender 4.5
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 3.6
3% 3.5 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 2.26%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteon CA3-8D512 512GB
52GB free (System drive)
Firmware: C490903
SusWrite @10s intervals: 310 222 206 193 198 137 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 1,070
Write 709
Mixed 283
SusWrite 211
125% 568 MB/s
4K Read 25.9
4K Write 33.8
4K Mixed 29.5
95% 29.7 MB/s
DQ Read 608
DQ Write 422
DQ Mixed 507
381% 512 MB/s
Poor: 98%
This bench: 108%
Great: 228%
WD My Passport 264F 1TB
212GB free
Firmware: 2005
SusWrite @10s intervals: 218 289 335 307 302 507 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
62.2% Good
Read 444
Write 340
Mixed 487
SusWrite 326
90% 399 MB/s
4K Read 16.9
4K Write 25.8
4K Mixed 19.9
65% 20.9 MB/s
DQ Read 89.8
DQ Write 101
DQ Mixed 90.9
70% 94 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 62.2%
Great: 84%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CTD 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
74.7% Very good
MC Read 30
MC Write 28.5
MC Mixed 22.8
77% 27.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 26.9
SC Mixed 17
54% 18.9 GB/s
Latency 64
62% 64 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 74.7%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Blade 15 Mid 2019-Base Builds (Compare 1,021 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Razer Blade 15 Mid 2019-Base

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback