Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 36% Jet ski	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	2.24% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	68.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N4100 6,492 User benchmarks, average bench 33% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	37.3% Below average	Memory 41.8 1-Core 45.5 2-Core 99.8 36% 62.4 Pts	4-Core 190 8-Core 188 25% 189 Pts	64-Core 191 12% 191 Pts
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 37.3% Great: 41%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600 35,976 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Device(1E50 8003) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.6813 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	2.24% Terrible	Lighting 2.1 Reflection 3.1 Parallax 2.3 2% 2.5 fps	MRender 5.8 Gravity 2.3 Splatting 4 3% 4.03 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.24% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston RBUSNS8180S3256GJ 256GB 456 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 104GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFK61D1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 320 79 72 69 64 68 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	68.9% Good	Read 333 Write 281 Mixed 275 SusWrite 112 56% 250 MB/s	4K Read 25.5 4K Write 62.5 4K Mixed 33.3 114% 40.4 MB/s	DQ Read 282 DQ Write 315 DQ Mixed 204 180% 267 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 68.9% Great: 85%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
ABCD 123456789012345678 4x2GB 5,869 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM LPDDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	25.5% Poor	MC Read 9.1 MC Write 9.8 MC Mixed 10.8 28% 9.9 GB/s	SC Read 2.4 SC Write 4.5 SC Mixed 3.4 10% 3.43 GB/s	Latency 194 21% 194 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 25.5% Great: 29%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 34%

Sail boat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron J4125IntelBench 35%, 2,594 samples	67x
Celeron N4100IntelBench 33%, 6,492 samples	36x
N100IntelBench 48%, 1,491 samples	11x

GPU
UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples	111x
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 3%, 1,086 samples	11x
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 4%, 2,226 samples	9x

SSD
256GB 256GBNetacBench 67%, 2,108 samples	41x
S535N8/256GYN 256GBNetacBench 60%, 120 samples	12x
RBUSNS8180S3256GJ 256GBKingstonBench 68%, 456 samples	12x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16