Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 80% Battleship	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 78% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	112% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	77.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME X370-PRO (all builds)
Memory	12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170605
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 28 '17 at 16:28
Run Duration	173 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	17%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X-$125 140,440 User benchmarks, average bench 74% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	69.2% Good	Memory 72.5 1-Core 117 2-Core 204 74% 131 Pts	4-Core 354 8-Core 680 61% 517 Pts	64-Core 928 57% 928 Pts
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 69.2% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% Zotac(19DA 0426) CLim: 2075 MHz, MLim: 2702 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 382.53 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	112% Outstanding	Lighting 152 Reflection 154 Parallax 132 124% 146 fps	MRender 116 Gravity 138 Splatting 107 97% 120 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 112% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80 69,224 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 59GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 6176 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 933 (B1) Unknown 94 94 108 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 66 44 34 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 42 (F1) Unknown 99 99 11773426281	77.9% Very good	Read 510 Write 414 Mixed 419 100% 447 MB/s	4K Read 32.3 4K Write 59.1 4K Mixed 17.9 103% 36.4 MB/s	DQ Read 33.8 DQ Write 60.5 DQ Mixed 18.1 22% 37.5 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 77.9% Great: 115%
Fujitsu MJA2500BH FFS G1 500GB 66 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 346GB free Firmware: 00810021 Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 4310 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 84 84 8318 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 3472 (A0) Unknown 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 317872996552 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 86 86 286787 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 244813594649 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 253 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 0 (CB) Run out cancel 94 93 0 (F0) Head flying hours 200 200 0 (FE) Unknown 100 100 3263	41.7% Average	Read 71 Write 74.2 Mixed 72.7 55% 72.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.49 4K Write 1.45 4K Mixed 0.35 86% 0.76 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 41.7% Great: 48%
Samsung HD502HI 500GB-$154 24,344 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 84GB free Firmware: 1AG01113 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 96 8 (03) Spinup time 93 93 3050 (04) Start/Stop count 95 95 5495 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 10595 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 17409 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 5 (0C) Power cycle count 95 95 4851 (0D) Soft read error rate 100 96 8 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 136 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 84 53 269484048 (C2) HDA temperature 80 51 336592916 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 263850 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 4 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 253 253 0	48.1% Average	Read 68.3 Write 99.3 Mixed 96.6 67% 88.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.31 4K Write 1.63 4K Mixed 0.27 73% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 48.1% Great: 59%
ASMT 2105 1TB 1,332 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 425GB free, PID 55aa Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	63.2% Good	Read 172 Write 156 Mixed 128 191% 152 MB/s	4K Read 1.01 4K Write 1.27 4K Mixed 0.32 58% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 63.2% Great: 79%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$43 606,405 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz Performing below potential (40^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	75.5% Very good	MC Read 28.4 MC Write 27.4 MC Mixed 25.3 77% 27 GB/s	SC Read 20.4 SC Write 28.5 SC Mixed 23.2 69% 24 GB/s	Latency 95.7 42% 95.7 ns
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 75.5% Great: 104%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME X370-PRO Builds (Compare 2,527 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 74%

Battleship

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	417x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	326x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	204x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	214x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	194x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	189x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	94x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	89x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	75x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	160x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	122x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	57x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $847

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)