Fujitsu AMILO Li1705

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 21.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2.5GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 2.5GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 12 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (73%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemFujitsu AMILO Li1705  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU AMILO Li1705
Memory1.5 GB free of 2.5 GB @ 0.5 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20070215
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 24 '21 at 12:07
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU 73%

 PC Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Celeron M 520
mPGA 479M, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
21.3% Poor
Memory 39.3
1-Core 11
2-Core 17.6
18% 22.6 Pts
4-Core 20.9
8-Core 23.8
3% 22.3 Pts
64-Core 23.4
2% 23.4 Pts
Poor: 15%
This bench: 21.3%
Great: 32%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
VIA Chrome9 HC IGP WDDM 1.1
Fijitsu Siemens(1734 10F7) 256MB
Driver: VTGUModeDX32.dll Ver. 8.14.14.87
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Lighting 0
Reflection 0.2
0% 0.1 fps
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Seagate ST980811AS 80GB-$99
58GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.ALB
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 14 10 7.4 17 9.8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
10.7% Very poor
Read 25.3
Write 25.6
Mixed 12.3
SusWrite 12
14% 18.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.1
29% 0.27 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 10.7%
Great: 24%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 2GB
null MHz
512, 2048 MB
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
6.02% Terrible
MC Read 2.3
MC Write 1.9
MC Mixed 1
5% 1.73 GB/s
SC Read 1.7
SC Write 1.6
SC Mixed 0.8
4% 1.37 GB/s
Latency 206
20% 206 ns
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.02%
Great: 24%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $380Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $77SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback