Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results


Gaming 80% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 83% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 81% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	98.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (62%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) (all builds)
Memory	20.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200701
Uptime	2.1 Days
Run Date	Mar 23 '21 at 20:39
Run Duration	264 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	62%

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$205 635,419 User benchmarks, average bench 86% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 4.05 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	79% Very good	Memory 69.3 1-Core 137 2-Core 232 80% 146 Pts	4-Core 475 8-Core 840 79% 657 Pts	64-Core 1,220 76% 1,220 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 79% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$255 447,556 User benchmarks, average bench 100% Asus(1043 87F5) CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 461.92 Performing below potential (38^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	98.6% Outstanding	Lighting 128 Reflection 117 Parallax 120 104% 122 fps	MRender 143 Gravity 101 Splatting 87.4 88% 110 fps
Poor: 90% ↑ This bench: 98.6% Great: 106%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB (2019)-$74 114,373 User benchmarks, average bench 277% 12GB free (System drive) Firmware: 111110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,434 Write 1,430 Mixed 1,746 345% 1,536 MB/s	4K Read 43.7 4K Write 101 4K Mixed 48 181% 64.4 MB/s	DQ Read 1,189 DQ Write 957 DQ Mixed 1,088 810% 1,078 MB/s
Poor: 188% Great: 347%
Samsung 860 QVO 2TB-$200 28,979 User benchmarks, average bench 98% 664GB free Firmware: RVQ01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 262 393 404 356 358 368 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	72.6% Very good	Read 214 Write 219 Mixed 303 SusWrite 357 62% 273 MB/s	4K Read 29.7 4K Write 72.5 4K Mixed 22.4 112% 41.5 MB/s	DQ Read 219 DQ Write 185 DQ Mixed 199 150% 201 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 72.6% Great: 122%
Samsung 860 QVO 2TB-$200 28,979 User benchmarks, average bench 98% 2TB free Firmware: RVQ01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 262 393 404 357 358 368 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	82.8% Excellent	Read 340 Write 387 Mixed 280 SusWrite 357 77% 341 MB/s	4K Read 30.6 4K Write 79.1 4K Mixed 30.3 127% 46.7 MB/s	DQ Read 219 DQ Write 184 DQ Mixed 199 150% 201 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 82.8% Great: 122%
WD WD4005FZBX-00K5WB0 4TB 14,138 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 3.5TB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 192 233 219 216 194 213 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	105% Outstanding	Read 152 Write 236 Mixed 79.1 SusWrite 211 123% 170 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 7.6 4K Mixed 1.6 364% 3.43 MB/s
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 136%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016)-$80 112,118 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 2.5TB free Firmware: CC26 SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 178 176 163 157 159 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	92% Outstanding	Read 157 Write 83.1 Mixed 79.5 SusWrite 164 89% 121 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.8 136% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 92% Great: 114%
WD WD4005FZBX-00K5WB0 4TB 14,138 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 3.5TB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 227 213 219 219 230 217 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	129% Outstanding	Read 228 Write 177 Mixed 96.6 SusWrite 221 132% 181 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 4.3 4K Mixed 1.9 332% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 129% Great: 136%
WD WD4005FZBX-00K5WB0 4TB 14,138 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 3.5TB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 225 222 218 227 233 218 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 76% Great: 136%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BL16G32C16U4B.M16FE 2x16GB 2,546 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	75.1% Very good	MC Read 31.5 MC Write 20 MC Mixed 31.1 79% 27.5 GB/s	SC Read 18.7 SC Write 18.6 SC Mixed 26.8 61% 21.4 GB/s	Latency 103 39% 103 ns
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 75.1% Great: 117%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 25,794 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 129%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 130%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $192

CPU
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	4,640x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $185Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	4,262x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $149Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	3,408x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	2,234x
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	2,072x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	1,466x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	1,834x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $96Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	1,105x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	865x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	770x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	724x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $114Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	646x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 97% - Outstanding

Total price: $937

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $274	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16