Performance Results


Gaming 74% Battleship	Desktop 93% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 63% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	79.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	265% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9750H 328,182 User benchmarks, average bench 73% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	89.2% Excellent	Memory 94 1-Core 95.2 2-Core 246 81% 145 Pts	4-Core 468 8-Core 591 68% 529 Pts	64-Core 754 47% 754 Pts
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 89.2% Great: 87%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Intel UHD Graphics 630 506,702 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Acer(1025 1333) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9316 Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	6.42% Terrible	Lighting 6.2 Reflection 98.4 Parallax 8.6 5% 37.7 fps	MRender 11.5 Gravity 7.4 Splatting 13.5 9% 10.8 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 6.42% Great: 6%
Nvidia RTX 2060 (Mobile) 119,687 User benchmarks, average bench 71% Acer(1025 1334) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2280 MHz, MLim: 2897 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 461.92 Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	79.1% Very good	Lighting 97.1 Reflection 95.6 Parallax 98.7 79% 97.1 fps	MRender 114 Gravity 95.5 Splatting 85.5 79% 98.4 fps
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 79.1% Great: 83%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$158 331,647 User benchmarks, average bench 297% 580GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1324 977 1017 1012 988 1063 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	265% Outstanding	Read 2,500 Write 2,208 Mixed 1,652 SusWrite 1,063 415% 1,856 MB/s	4K Read 53 4K Write 105 4K Mixed 69.6 225% 76 MB/s	DQ Read 718 DQ Write 606 DQ Mixed 671 500% 665 MB/s
Poor: 214% ↑ This bench: 265% Great: 372%
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$109 201,200 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 243GB free Firmware: RVQ02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 424 454 450 447 452 454 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	107% Outstanding	Read 495 Write 475 Mixed 404 SusWrite 447 103% 455 MB/s	4K Read 30.6 4K Write 80.9 4K Mixed 41.9 143% 51.1 MB/s	DQ Read 371 DQ Write 334 DQ Mixed 348 262% 351 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 121%
Nvme WDC PC SN720 SDA 256GB 3,211 User benchmarks, average bench 159% 238GB free Firmware: 10121000 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 636 425 427 428 427 428 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	187% Outstanding	Read 1,727 Write 1,490 Mixed 1,424 SusWrite 462 285% 1,276 MB/s	4K Read 40.4 4K Write 110 4K Mixed 57.3 193% 69.1 MB/s	DQ Read 772 DQ Write 552 DQ Mixed 653 490% 659 MB/s
Poor: 122% ↑ This bench: 187% Great: 191%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905624-022.A00G 2x8GB 56 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	72% Very good	MC Read 27.8 MC Write 27.5 MC Mixed 19.4 71% 24.9 GB/s	SC Read 17.1 SC Write 26.9 SC Mixed 24.4 65% 22.8 GB/s	Latency 59.7 67% 59.7 ns
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 72% Great: 87%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 12%

Tree trunk

Desktop 71%

Battleship

Workstation 12%

Tree trunk

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	1,247x
GTX 1650 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 41%, 92,838 samples	630x
RTX 2060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 71%, 119,687 samples	339x

SSD
PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G-1014 512GBWDCBench 168%, 18,999 samples	310x
Micron_2200_MTFDHBA512TCK 512GBBench 188%, 4,220 samples	277x
RBUSNS8154P3512GJ1 512GBKingstonBench 126%, 5,630 samples	224x

RAM
ACR26D4S9S8ME-8 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 17,072 samples	306x
HMA81GS6JJR8N-VK 2x8GBHynixBench 76%, 29,128 samples	295x
ACR26D4S9S8ME-8 1x8GBKingstonBench 42%, 19,360 samples	172x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16