Asrock B365 Phantom Gaming 4

Performance Results


Gaming 71% Battleship	Desktop 91% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 66% Battle cruiser


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	77.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	93.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asrock B365 Phantom Gaming 4 (all builds)
Memory	18.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190109
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 23 '21 at 15:39
Run Duration	248 Seconds
Run User	SYC-User
Background CPU	31%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8700-$200 349,567 User benchmarks, average bench 87% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	88.4% Excellent	Memory 85.5 1-Core 134 2-Core 272 90% 164 Pts	4-Core 491 8-Core 815 80% 653 Pts	64-Core 1,007 62% 1,007 Pts
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 88.4% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Zotac(19DA 1445) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 461.92 Performing below potential (42^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	77.6% Very good	Lighting 95 Reflection 110 Parallax 96.9 77% 100 fps	MRender 94.8 Gravity 94.6 Splatting 96 78% 95.1 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 77.6% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 1TB-$66 202,785 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 392GB free (System drive) Firmware: M3CR020 SusWrite @10s intervals: 410 396 415 406 403 392 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	93.9% Outstanding	Read 476 Write 428 Mixed 413 SusWrite 404 97% 430 MB/s	4K Read 25.1 4K Write 54.2 4K Mixed 33.1 109% 37.5 MB/s	DQ Read 386 DQ Write 341 DQ Mixed 297 241% 341 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 93.9% Great: 125%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$66 202,785 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 222GB free Firmware: M3CR023 SusWrite @10s intervals: 409 415 421 421 404 389 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	94.6% Outstanding	Read 479 Write 422 Mixed 394 SusWrite 410 96% 426 MB/s	4K Read 24.9 4K Write 54.2 4K Mixed 33.8 110% 37.6 MB/s	DQ Read 386 DQ Write 341 DQ Mixed 305 245% 344 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 94.6% Great: 125%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$40 235,501 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 2TB free Firmware: CC26 SusWrite @10s intervals: 194 207 208 205 208 208 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	112% Outstanding	Read 187 Write 129 Mixed 79.9 SusWrite 205 110% 150 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.7 138% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 112% Great: 113%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 1TB (2016)-$70 66,332 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 668GB free Firmware: CC41 SusWrite @10s intervals: 196 205 206 208 208 206 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	105% Outstanding	Read 159 Write 189 Mixed 28.2 SusWrite 205 105% 145 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 5.1 4K Mixed 2.1 382% 2.83 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 111%
Jmicron Tech 3TB 83 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 3TB free Firmware: 0407 SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 134 135 132 133 134 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	79.5% Very good	Read 144 Write 115 Mixed 104 SusWrite 133 92% 124 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 1 198% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 79.5% Great: 119%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 4TB 3,010 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 2TB free, PID 0900 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 112 112 112 113 113 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	47.6% Average	Read 143 Write 142 Mixed 19.2 SusWrite 113 134% 104 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.5 43% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 47.6% Great: 53%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB 14,232 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 931GB free, PID a202 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 112 113 113 113 113 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	46.2% Average	Read 112 Write 109 Mixed 37.2 SusWrite 113 123% 92.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.5 77% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 46.2% Great: 49%
SanDisk Ultra Fit 250GB 651 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 146GB free, PID 5583 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 17 17 16 17 17 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	14.1% Very poor	Read 35.7 Write 17.2 Mixed 19.3 SusWrite 16.6 27% 22.2 MB/s	4K Read 6.8 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 1 100% 3 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 14.1% Great: 36%
PI-239 USB 2.0 Drive 640GB 157 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 587GB free, PID 1840 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 42 42 42 42 42 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	16.6% Very poor	Read 40.7 Write 33.6 Mixed 34.2 SusWrite 41.7 51% 37.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.4 32% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 16.6% Great: 20%
SanDisk Cruzer Fit 64GB 1,850 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 44GB free, PID 5571 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.9 5.8 6.6 7.1 7.4 6.9 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	5.39% Terrible	Read 20.7 Write 8.9 Mixed 4.2 SusWrite 6.2 11% 10 MB/s	4K Read 3.1 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 1.8 76% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 5.39% Great: 17%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 4x8GB 3,364 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (37^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	69.8% Good	MC Read 24.7 MC Write 26.9 MC Mixed 21.4 70% 24.3 GB/s	SC Read 16.5 SC Write 28.4 SC Mixed 23 65% 22.6 GB/s	Latency 71.6 56% 71.6 ns
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 69.8% Great: 96%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical B365 Phantom Gaming 4 Builds (Compare 2,109 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 69%

Battle cruiser

Desktop 89%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 58%

Gunboat

Motherboard: Asrock B365 Phantom Gaming 4

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	1,247x
Core i7-9700KIntel $252Bench 97%, 550,833 samples	143x
Core i5-9600KIntel $155Bench 93%, 321,194 samples	118x

GPU
GTX 1660-TiNvidia $143Bench 76%, 318,562 samples	364x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $233Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	350x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	282x

SSD
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $60Bench 156%, 162,275 samples	238x
SSDPEKNW010T9 1TBIntelBench 216%, 20,963 samples	226x
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBIntel $74Bench 191%, 163,917 samples	213x

RAM
TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x8GBUnknownBench 85%, 99,207 samples	803x
TEAMGROUP-UD4-3000 2x8GBUnknownBench 82%, 74,390 samples	90x
TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 4x8GBUnknownBench 89%, 16,526 samples	62x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 106% - Outstanding

Total price: $305

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16