Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive	150% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

PC Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9750H 328,182 User benchmarks, average bench 73% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	72.7% Very good	Memory 79.6 1-Core 88.6 2-Core 188 68% 119 Pts	4-Core 355 8-Core 517 54% 436 Pts	64-Core 623 39% 623 Pts
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 72.7% Great: 87%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Pm981a NVMe Samsung 512GB 3,592 User benchmarks, average bench 220% 215GB free (System drive) Firmware: 15302129 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 874 738 839 841 802 710 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	150% Outstanding	Read 808 Write 1,117 Mixed 884 SusWrite 800 204% 902 MB/s	4K Read 43.6 4K Write 70.5 4K Mixed 46.3 163% 53.5 MB/s	DQ Read 557 DQ Write 264 DQ Mixed 334 268% 385 MB/s
Poor: 132% ↑ This bench: 150% Great: 298%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CTD 2x8GB 43,895 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing below potential (19^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	70.2% Very good	MC Read 26.8 MC Write 25.7 MC Mixed 21.9 71% 24.8 GB/s	SC Read 12.1 SC Write 31 SC Mixed 23.8 64% 22.3 GB/s	Latency 81.3 49% 81.3 ns
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 70.2% Great: 85%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 12%

Tree trunk

Desktop 71%

Battleship

Workstation 12%

Tree trunk

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	2,478x
GTX 1650 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 41%, 92,838 samples	1,491x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	6x

SSD
NVMe SK hynix 512GBPc601Bench 162%, 6,475 samples	251x
NVMe Samsung 1024GBPm981aBench 240%, 3,869 samples	232x
NVMe INTEL 1024GBSsdpemkf010t8Bench 205%, 2,189 samples	205x

RAM
HMA81GS6JJR8N-VK 2x8GBUnknownBench 74%, 13,906 samples	588x
HMA82GS6JJR8N-VK 2x16GBUnknownBench 80%, 6,839 samples	545x
M471A1K43DB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 76%, 43,895 samples	294x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16