| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
| Graphics | 19.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (55%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus P5Q (all builds) |
| Memory | 4 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
| Display | Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20090304 |
| Uptime | 0.6 Days |
| Run Date | Mar 22 '21 at 09:07 |
| Run Duration | 130 Seconds |
| Run User | UKR-User |
| Background CPU | 55% |
PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core2 Duo E8600-$180
LGA 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.35 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
|
36.7%
Below average
|
40% 64.7 Pts
|
11% 80.4 Pts
|
4% 72.8 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 660-$170
MSI(1462 2872) 2GB
CLim: 1228 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
|
19.6%
Very poor
|
18% 26.9 fps
|
23% 28.5 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
293GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 30 42 56 53 59 MB/s
|
27.5%
Poor
|
31% 41.9 MB/s
|
116% 0.8 MB/s
| |
|
Samsung Spinpoint F1 750GB-$60
207GB free
Firmware: 1AA01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 51 56 56 57 57 MB/s
|
43.5%
Average
|
44% 58.8 MB/s
|
172% 1.3 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
|
16.8%
Very poor
|
16% 5.63 GB/s
|
11% 3.73 GB/s
|
31% 131 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical P5Q Builds (Compare 405 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus P5Q
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core2 Quad Q9550Intel $161Bench 49%, 34,093 samples | 74x |
| Core2 Duo E8400Intel $89Bench 40%, 68,540 samples | 56x |
| Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples | 38x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples | 23x |
| GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 21x |
| GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples | 18x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 52% - Above average | Total price: $189 |