Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 18% Surfboard	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (7th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 93 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 19%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	0.49% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	34.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N4100 6,492 User benchmarks, average bench 33% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 1.5 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	19% Very poor	Memory 27.8 1-Core 11.6 2-Core 24.8 15% 21.4 Pts	4-Core 59.1 8-Core 63 8% 61 Pts	64-Core 47.9 3% 47.9 Pts
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 19% Great: 41%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600 35,976 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Intel(8086 2212) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8853 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	0.49% Terrible	Lighting 0.4 Reflection 0.8 Parallax 0.7 0% 0.63 fps	MRender 0.8 Gravity 1.4 Splatting 0.8 1% 1 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.49% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Teclast 256GB NA850-2280 256GB 288 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 176GB free (System drive) Firmware: S1127B0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 291 296 117 84 75 84 MB/s Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	34.1% Below average	Read 177 Write 124 Mixed 181 SusWrite 158 36% 160 MB/s	4K Read 4 4K Write 15.4 4K Mixed 13.7 32% 11 MB/s	DQ Read 163 DQ Write 145 DQ Mixed 38.6 60% 116 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 34.1% Great: 75%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
ABCD 123456789012345678 4x2GB 5,869 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM LPDDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	14.6% Very poor	MC Read 1.9 MC Write 8.2 MC Mixed 6.9 16% 5.67 GB/s	SC Read 1.1 SC Write 2.1 SC Mixed 1.1 4% 1.43 GB/s	Latency 268 15% 268 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 14.6% Great: 29%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 32%

Sail boat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron N4100IntelBench 33%, 6,492 samples	59x

GPU
UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples	59x

SSD
256GB NA850-2280 256GBTeclastBench 57%, 288 samples	51x
256G 256GBHs-ssd-e100nBench 69%, 909 samples	4x
1100 SATA 256GBMicronBench 73%, 16,265 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16