Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive	25.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (48%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium T4400-$110 7,903 User benchmarks, average bench 34% Onboard, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	41.2% Average	Memory 72.8 1-Core 29.8 2-Core 60.5 38% 54.4 Pts	4-Core 59.6 8-Core 58.9 8% 59.2 Pts	64-Core 60.9 4% 60.9 Pts
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 41.2% Great: 41%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
DM F500 120G 120GB 20 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 71GB free (System drive) Firmware: FW20 SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 149 128 146 139 190 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	25.3% Poor	Read 238 Write 176 Mixed 146 SusWrite 152 40% 178 MB/s	4K Read 4.5 4K Write 8.3 4K Mixed 6 19% 6.27 MB/s	DQ Read 10.8 DQ Write 13.2 DQ Mixed 7.4 7% 10.5 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 25.3% Great: 94%
WD WD3200BEVS-16VAT0 320GB 1,492 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 140GB free Firmware: 11.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 41 37 40 40 50 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	28.1% Poor	Read 56 Write 54.6 Mixed 33 SusWrite 41.7 34% 46.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.7 122% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 28.1% Great: 37%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM 15h Reserved Performing below potential (35^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	15% Very poor	MC Read 5.2 MC Write 3.8 MC Mixed 4.1 12% 4.37 GB/s	SC Read 4.5 SC Write 4 SC Mixed 4 12% 4.17 GB/s	Latency 95.1 42% 95.1 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 15% Great: 44%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16