Asus TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics45.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive205% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX505DT
Memory13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210128
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 20 '21 at 09:26
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
69.2% Good
Memory 69.9
1-Core 112
2-Core 218
73% 133 Pts
4-Core 369
8-Core 584
59% 476 Pts
64-Core 562
35% 562 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 69.2%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650 (Mobile)
Asus(1043 109F) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 128MB, Driver: 20.10.32
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
45.2% Average
Lighting 59.1
Reflection 63.2
Parallax 51.7
48% 58 fps
MRender 41.8
Gravity 51.6
Splatting 49.6
39% 47.7 fps
Poor: 28%
This bench: 45.2%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$59
161GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 32B3T8EB Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 357 257 236 236 234 241 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
205% Outstanding
Read 2,137
Write 1,155
Mixed 1,204
SusWrite 260
263% 1,189 MB/s
4K Read 55.4
4K Write 116
4K Mixed 70.8
236% 80.9 MB/s
DQ Read 794
DQ Write 570
DQ Mixed 412
381% 592 MB/s
Poor: 139%
This bench: 205%
Great: 271%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
858GB free
Firmware: SDM4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 79 76 74 76 79 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
26.2% Poor
Read 15.8
Write 14.8
Mixed 33.6
SusWrite 75
26% 34.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.3
75% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 26.2%
Great: 71%
ASMT 2115 320GB
260GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.6 8.8 8 8.1 8.1 8.8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
3.52% Terrible
Read 3.3
Write 8
Mixed 6.5
SusWrite 8.2
10% 6.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.1
17% 0.2 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 3.52%
Great: 37%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 TEAMGROUP-SD4-2400 16GB
3200, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
73.7% Very good
MC Read 27.2
MC Write 27.3
MC Mixed 25.7
76% 26.7 GB/s
SC Read 19.3
SC Write 25.9
SC Mixed 21
63% 22.1 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 73.7%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT Builds (Compare 2,815 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Asus TUF Gaming FX505DT_FX505DT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback