| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 46.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
| Motherboard | Asus P5Q DELUXE (all builds) |
| Memory | 3.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20090710 |
| Uptime | 0.6 Days |
| Run Date | Mar 19 '21 at 20:42 |
| Run Duration | 111 Seconds |
| Run User | ITA-User |
| Background CPU | 39% |
PC Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
41.1%
Average
|
37% 53.8 Pts
|
16% 118 Pts
|
7% 112 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD R9 290X-$549
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.2.2
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
46.7%
Average
|
49% 64.1 fps
|
43% 53.5 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
62.5%
Good
|
67% 91.7 MB/s
|
126% 0.8 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
|
16.4%
Very poor
|
15% 5.27 GB/s
|
12% 4.27 GB/s
|
34% 119 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical P5Q DELUXE Builds (Compare 203 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus P5Q DELUXE
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core2 Quad Q9550Intel $161Bench 49%, 34,093 samples | 71x |
| Core2 Quad Q9650Intel $170Bench 51%, 16,719 samples | 20x |
| Core2 Quad Q9400Intel $170Bench 46%, 24,176 samples | 15x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples | 11x |
| HD 4870ATIBench 9%, 22,563 samples | 10x |
| GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples | 10x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 40% - Below average | Total price: $459 |