Intel To be filled by O.E.M.

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 88%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics107% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive176% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardIntel To be filled by O.E.M.  (all builds)
Memory13 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190118
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 19 '21 at 19:30
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2689 0
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
77.3% Very good
Memory 90.3
1-Core 85.2
2-Core 172
69% 116 Pts
4-Core 346
8-Core 657
60% 501 Pts
64-Core 879
54% 879 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 77.3%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2702 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 461.92
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Lighting 136
Reflection 146
Parallax 136
111% 139 fps
MRender 118
Gravity 144
Splatting 125
106% 129 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 107%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Asgard AN3 500NVMe-M.2/80 500GB
412GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 42A4SANA Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 702 882 1049 1014 1045 685 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
176% Outstanding
Read 1,258
Write 1,105
Mixed 159
SusWrite 896
190% 855 MB/s
4K Read 34.6
4K Write 88.5
4K Mixed 47.3
160% 56.8 MB/s
DQ Read 565
DQ Write 397
DQ Mixed 504
370% 489 MB/s
Poor: 161%
This bench: 176%
Great: 349%
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
186GB free
Firmware: SBFK61K1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 399 69 121 68 67 75 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
66.1% Good
Read 452
Write 366
Mixed 326
SusWrite 133
71% 319 MB/s
4K Read 23.9
4K Write 53.1
4K Mixed 25.1
96% 34 MB/s
DQ Read 153
DQ Write 316
DQ Mixed 127
127% 199 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 66.1%
Great: 100%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$32
457GB free
Firmware: JC66
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 125 125 126 127 126 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
71.6% Very good
Read 124
Write 125
Mixed 65.5
SusWrite 125
81% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1.1
188% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 71.6%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B5170GB0- 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
108% Outstanding
MC Read 45.8
MC Write 44.1
MC Mixed 39.9
124% 43.3 GB/s
SC Read 16.2
SC Write 12.1
SC Mixed 12.3
39% 13.5 GB/s
Latency 66.7
60% 66.7 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 108%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical To be filled by O.E.M. Builds (Compare 568 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel To be filled by O.E.M.

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $98
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback