User System

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.89% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive94.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHUANANZHI
MotherboardHUANANZHI X99-BD4
Memory12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201101
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 19 '21 at 03:50
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User CRI-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (85th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
75.3% Very good
Memory 91.1
1-Core 78
2-Core 188
69% 119 Pts
4-Core 322
8-Core 499
51% 410 Pts
64-Core 614
38% 614 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
Gigabyte(1458 400A) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 461.92
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
3.89% Terrible
Lighting 4.6
Reflection 6.8
Parallax 5
4% 5.47 fps
MRender 6.3
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 5.1
4% 5.1 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.89%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU650NS38 120GB
66GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 429a
SusWrite @10s intervals: 392 394 395 393 118 77 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
94.1% Outstanding
Read 438
Write 370
Mixed 389
SusWrite 295
84% 373 MB/s
4K Read 35.2
4K Write 94
4K Mixed 39.4
154% 56.2 MB/s
DQ Read 228
DQ Write 296
DQ Mixed 240
187% 255 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 94.1%
Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Atermiter 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (78th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
61.3% Good
MC Read 25.9
MC Write 19.5
MC Mixed 19.6
62% 21.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 17.7
47% 16.6 GB/s
Latency 65.6
61% 65.6 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 61.3%
Great: 70%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback